Talk:Vertebrate

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vertebrate article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Animals Top‑importance

Vertebrate is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Tree of Life High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Thelytoky#Automixis with terminal fusion|terminal automixis]] The anchor (#Automixis with terminal fusion) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

"Phylogenetic relationships" Outdated Taxonomy

The "Phylogenetic relationships" section of this article, while looking very well made, has some outdated taxonomy in it regarding Acanthodii and Placodermi groups. The biggest problem are the Acanthodians, which here are shown as being a spread across chondrichthyes and osteichthyes while more recent taxonomy has them all as stem-chondrichthyans. The Placoderms look alright, but they should mention "maxillate" placoderms like Entelognathus. I believe they should take the place of Diplacanthus on the diagram.

I would do it myself, but I'm unfamiliar with editing clade diagrams. Jvirus2 (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tetrapoda are listed as a sub-class of Sarcopterygii in the main article body

Looks like there may be a problem with the layout of the list of classes in the main article body. For example, Tetrapoda appear to be listed as a sub-class of Sarcopterygii. 104.142.119.254 (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Ossea" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ossea has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § Ossea until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Anatomy of vertebrates" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Anatomy of vertebrates has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § Anatomy of vertebrates until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"New" materials and citations in lead

The lead currently has 12 citations, of which 9 are found only up there. The cited materials are similarly largely not in the article body.

This is in violation of the basic rule that the lead is only a summary of the article body. It must therefore not introduce anything "new".

It is also pretty doubtful if space in lead should go to odd exceptions like lampreys/hagfish. As a simple introduction for new or passing readers who want the briefest and clearest of overviews (what is a vertebrate?), the lead needs to provide a simple "broad brush" overview, even at the expense of overlooking fascinatingly technical distinctions like the possibly-odd status of the hagfish vis-a-vis the lampreys and other fishes.

In short, the lead needs a rewrite, and We need to move the citations and "new" materials out of the lead. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]