User talk:Foobar

This user may have left Wikipedia. Foobar has not edited Wikipedia since 1 May 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi there. I couldn't help noticing those superb photographs of Gallium crystals that you've uploaded. I've listed one of them on Wikipedia:Featured pictures candidates - a page where particularly good photographs on the site are recognised. Keep up the great work! - MykReeve 01:23, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Yes - very nice photo! --mav 04:14, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I assume we will soon be seeing a Wikipedia article on how to grow Gallium crystals? ;) --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:43, Mar 27, 2004 (UTC)

weird diff

Hi -- I did a diff for your change on Black hole (05:13, 24 Sep 2004, edit summary "rm older vandalism"), compared to the previous version, and it shows the "Interest in collapsed objects..." paragraph with a minus on the left and a plus on the right, but with no changes highlighted. If I edit the two versions and copy the entire content of the edit fields to files, the files are identical. So there doesn't seem to be any difference. I'm wondering whether this is a bug in the diff tool. Do you remember what you changed? Fpahl 09:05, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

They're not identical, actually. Look at the very end of that paragraph [1], you'll see I removed two .'s that some anon had inserted earlier here [2]. He did the same to another article. Funny you mention a bug in the diff tool -- while reverting, I couldn't access the previous diff! It gave me an error page identical to this except with the correct id number. The previous version is accessible now, though. It also contains the (in)correct data (search for "for example...").

--Foobar 02:44, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Strange. I could easily have overlooked the two dots visually, but it seems I must have also messed up copying out the content from the edit fields. I still have the two files that I diffed, and there's one dot in each of them. This together with your version retrieval problem is a bit mysterious. Let's hope it's not a hacker vandal :-) Fpahl 08:48, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

It's just that the spacing betwen paragraphs has changed slightly. It's not really a bug.

Gallium crystals

I'd just like to tell you that I think you did a wonderful job on your Gallium crystals photo. Good job! --Randy 02:42, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Featured picture (gallium)

Oooh, so pretty. Thanks! --fvw * 04:39, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

Show cats and genetic health problems

I noticed that you have edited the article show cat. There is currently a discussion on the talk page about the section that mentions health problems. The dissagreement is if the article should state that this is a problem (the position I have taken) or weather the article should state that this is a misconception which is not true. Your input would we appreciated. Dalf | Talk 23:40, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

caps bad

Huh? I just noticed that you undid an edit I did to the Palpatine entry. Because of a dispute I am currently locked out of any further editing of that entry. You changed the evil GALACTIC EMPIRE to read as the Galactic Empire. I used the capitalization to mimic the emphasizing capitalization of the name as Lucas did in the opening crawl of Return of the Jedi, The opening crawl also referred to the empire with the preposition "evil." You removed that too.

Query -- Why?

Robeykr 21:57, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you're using the same style as the two opening crawls, but I changed it to maintain consistency with wikipedia's link style and the content of other pages. Every other en: wikipedia page uses "Galactic Empire" alone and with that capitalization. In addition, the only instance of "evil Galactic Empire" is found in the opening crawl quoted on Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope.

Since no one else has used "GALACTIC EMPIRE" (with or without "evil") on any other Star Wars page here, I feel it just looks better.

--Foobar 22:28, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gallium crystals

Hi! How do you grow gallium crystals - I have access to most common lab chemicals (including a few gallium salts). I'd really love to grow a few. Nippoo 12:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You need to obtain at least 50 grams of highly pure (99.99%+) gallium metal, as impurities rapidly destroy its ability to form large crystals. I say 50 grams because anything less cools too quickly and isn't nearly as visually impressive. Put the metal in a sealable transparent plastic container. Melt the gallium completely, then leave it to cool and solidify. Measure the amount of time required for it to completely solidify. Then, remelt it, leave it to cool, and about 3/4 through the process, tilt the container so that the liquid gallium runs out from underneath the solid gallium, hopefully revealing your crystals. Let the remainder solidify, and you're done. If it doesn't form crystals, it's being cooled too quickly, or there wasn't a good seed crystal available. To combat the former, lightly insulate the container with some cloth; to combat the latter, swirl the gallium around as it's being melted and stop melting it when there's a small amount of solid mass left inside. If you have access to a precisely temperature-controlled enclosure (around 0.1-0.5 degree precision), this becomes far easier, as you set the enclosure to just below the melting point of gallium and wait.

Where can one find Gallium?

Ever since I learned of Gallium in my university chemistry course, two decades ago now, I've wanted to obtain some. I wouldn't even know where to look. I am in San Francisco, USA - so I figure in a city of this size and diversity I should be able to find some - but where to start looking? Any suggestions would be much appreciated. I'm still curious to see a metal turn to liquid in my hand :)

OK, forget my request. It seems Gallium is as costly as Gold! (link removed -- Foobar). Is this normal?

No, it isn't normal. That company appears to be severly inflating the cost of Gallium, taking advantage of the fact that most companies that deal in high purity elements do not sell to individuals. According to this USGS document, the average price per kilogram over the past five years has been around $505; not cheap but not mind-blowingly expensive either. The fact that this particular company wants 82 times the going market value per gram is nothing short of absurd. Try checking these companies out; you'll probably have to order through a local chemical distributor or university, however. ESPI Metals, Alfa-Aeser, American Elements. Good luck!

WikiProject Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week

WikiProject Pharmacology is currently organizing a new Collaboration of the Week program, designed to bring drug and medication related articles up to featured status. We're currently soliciting nominations and/or voting on nominations for the first WP:RxCOTW, to begin on September 5, 2007. Please stop by the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week

Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007.

Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin.

In other news:

Bupropion has been promoted to featured status on August 31, 2007.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project.

Garrondo is asking for individuals to help review Therapies for multiple sclerosis, as he is considering nominating this article for GA status.

Fvasconcellos notes that discussion is ongoing regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

Dr. Cash 00:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!

Aspirin has just completed its two week run as the first Collaboration of the Week! Many thanks to those editors that contributed; the article got a lot of good work accomplished, and in particular, much work was done in fixing up the history section. It's still not quite "done" yet (is a wikipedia article really ever done?), but after two weeks I think it's more important to push onwards with the development of the new collaboration of the week program. I will be fixing up Aspirin in the next few days and possibly nominating it for either GA or FA status.

Muscle relaxant has been selected as the new Collaboration of the week until October 2, 2007! This article is currently rated as a "stub", so it's got quite a bit of work cut out for collaborators! Admittedly, featured status could be a long way off,... but still attainable! At the least, maybe we could at least get it up to meeting the Good article criteria? Please stop by the article and help improve it.

Resveratrol, having recently achieved GA status on August 16, 2007, is now making a run for featured status. This is quite a fascinating compound. If you can, please stop by its discussion page and leave comments in support of it.

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing or dispensing medical advice amongst users. Specifically, talk pages of articles should only be used to discuss improving the actual article in question. To help alleviate this situation, the template {{talkheader}} may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism.

There was an interesting article on ZDNet last week about Hewlett Packard licensing its patented microneedle technology used in common inkjet printers to be used in transdermal patches to deliver a time-controlled release of drugs to patients. This information could be added to articles such as route of administration or drug delivery.

You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.

Dr. Cash 05:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:

The Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week has been changed to Collaboration of the Month, based on current participation levels. It is also more likely that articles collaborated on for one month are more likely to achieve featured quality than articles worked on for only a week or two.

The current Collaboration of the Month for November is Receptor antagonist. Please take a look at that article and contribute to it if you get a chance. Ideally, the article should adhere to the featured article criteria.

Therapies for multiple sclerosis is currently a featured article candidate. If you are familiar with the featured article criteria, please visit WP:FAC and review the article.

Anabolic steroid is the wikiproject's newest Featured Article, having been promoted on October 8, 2007.

Theobromine was delisted as a Good Article. The Peer review and GA reassessment discussions provide suggestions on improvement. Muscle relaxant was recently reviewed for Good Article status, but not promoted. Please see the full review full review here for details.

Dr. Cash 22:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallium2 640x480.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gallium2 640x480.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:Glue4 800x600.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glue4 800x600.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Overvolt1.png

Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is not present, please add {{claimed}} to the file description page, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please update it to {{img-claimed}} if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{Media by uploader}} tag is present, please add |claimed=yes to the tag, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion

If media remains unclaimed for over a year, it may be removed to ensure Wikipedia stays in compliance with copyright and media licensing policy.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Overvolt2.png

The file File:Overvolt2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Overvolt3.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm I am Being Here to Help You. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. this is a test I'm Here to Help You (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]