Talk:Camauro

Catholicism Low‑importance

Camauro is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

My first article

Wow, I've started my first article. =| Anyway, if anyone can find a picture for this, that'd be cool. The first one at 1 might be good, though I prefer something like 2. I have no idea what the copyright status of either of those is, though. And it's well past my bedtime. --User:Jenmoa 05:38, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Found a pic on Wikipedia. Heh, how bout that. XD I can't seem to resize it. If someone could make this page look a bit neater, that would be awesome. --User:Jenmoa 05:49, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Removed anon zucchetto edit

On 10:22, 2005 December 22, anonymous user 65.206.77.194 made an edit with the summary: Changed biretta to zucchetto. Cardinals wear birettas, not popes. I changed it back to biretta, because (as far as I can tell), the original intent of the sentence is that all R.C. clerics can wear a modern version of the four-cornered academic hat -- for lesser clergy (from seminarians to cardinals) this is the biretta (with variations in form) -- but the camauro is the pope's version of the academic hat. Thus the camauro is the pope's biretta, so to speak.

It would be interesting to know if popes have worn the camauro in addition to the zucchetto, or if they typically have taken the zucchetto off before doning the camauro. Anyone know? — Eoghanacht ^talk 17:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was the original intent of the sentence. I was about to remove the change, as well, but I left it because I figured it could be ambiguous. Whatever everyone else thinks... :) --User:Jenmoa 17:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Changed this a little again, but I'm not sure I got across what I was trying to say. I know zucchettos (zucchetti?) are also worn by other members of the clergy, but that the pope wears it only and not a biretta. I don't know how to fit that in concisely, anyone take a crack at it? =\ Thanks. --User:Jenmoa 01:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christmasy?

This may sound silly but I don't suppose the camauro has any connection with Santa's hat, does it? When I first saw the picture of Pope Benedict wearing it I thought he was just getting into the festive spirit but then realised it linked to this article - the two do look similar except one doesn't have the bob at the back!? Craigy (talk) 23:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no proof mind, but the answer to your question is probably not.[1] Doing a quick google image search on St Nicholas of Myra (the prototype for Santa Claus) does not show that the camauro or anything like it was part of the traditional iconography. There are some promising ones showing him wearing red vestments but I suspect they are influenced by Fr C's image. Red vestments are used in pictures/statues of saints who are Martyrs (red being the colour for Martyrs' feast days). Stroika 23:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the bit about Benedict's being compared to Santa Claus removed? I don't particularly care if it's included or not, but in what way did it violate NPOV? Just wondering. --User:Jenmoa 19:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think a lot of people thought it was rather (if unintentionally) Christmasy. We should add it back, perferable with a citation. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Camauro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060906220947/http://members.ozemail.com.au:80/~acolyte/Roman%20Catholic%20Vestments/camauro.html to http://members.ozemail.com.au/~acolyte/Roman%20Catholic%20Vestments/camauro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camauro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060110151229/http://www.hatsuk.com/skullcaps.pdf to http://www.hatsuk.com/skullcaps.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]