User talk:Stoni

Non Falo Galego Mais...

Saludos, I would like to know where did you get the picture from the "Voz de Galicia". I want to put one in the "La Vanguardia" article but i'm not sure I can take it from the oficcial newspaper's webpage. Gracias! Adleos 20:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Galego over 10000 articles - message to lb

You wrote: "Wikipedia in Galician (Galego) has now more than 10000 articles. Could you please move it?" : Thank you for your message. Will be done soon. Greetings from Luxembourg. lb:User:Cornishong

Galicia

Hi Stoni,

In case you haven't noticed. Galicia is a disambig. page because if you check out what links there, it's pretty much 50/50 between the region in Spain and the region in Europe that links there. Please stop moving the pages. Thanks. --Hottentot 22:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't checked up the number of pages inside wikipedia. But if you check outside wikipedia you will know why do I do this. I'm sure links inside wikipedia can be corrected --Stoni 22:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Both Wikipedia articles are equally important. As many pages about the Galicia in Central Europe link to Galicia and the one in Spain. --Hottentot 22:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the [relevancy of links to Galicia article and the term Galicia in the Internet you will see that everything is about Spanish Galicia. I am sure that much people can link incorrectly in wikipedia. If you worry about this I can correct this also but will be more easy to correct Central Europe articles because there is no one outside wikipedia. Instead for spanish one you should correct 50% of articles at english wikipedia, all the other wikipedias that use Galicia for Spanish autonomous comunity (24 exactly/compared with 2) and other websites outside wikipedia. --Stoni 23:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but aren't equally important. Also Galician wikipedia has more than 10.000 articles. Also your calculus is incorrect, only 10% of articles are about central europe. Perhaps you saw some articles about Germany but it also link to Spanish Galcia --Stoni 23:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just an example: If you check links to Galicia one is about Karl I of Austria and as Central Europe Galicia is in Austria it should talk about it. But not, it also talks about Spanish Galicia. Perhaps this small Galicia took the name from the Spanish one. I have corrected all links it took me 10 minutes. Thanks, this will improve quality of Wikipedia. --Stoni 23:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stoni, I posted the following on my page re your request for assistance re WikiProject Galica:

I'm off the week after Christmas (yes, a week off!) and I'd be happy to pitch in at that time. Very interesting topic, I must say. One thing, could you send me a reminder around the 24th (I'm kind of like the absent-minded professor). Thanks, and I look forward to getting started. Jim62sch 17:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

I never said that you should move Galicia (Spain) to Galicia. It should remain a disambig. page because both meanings are equally important, and it goes according to Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View. Please stop switching instances where is linked to Galicia (Spain) to Galicia --Hottentot 23:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was enought to you what I told you to reflect biggest importance of Spanish Galicia in a neutral view. I thought it was better to move it because of now the only problem is that 50% of pages go to Galicia and 50% to Galicia (Spain), and 100% are about Spanish Galicia. There were just 6 pages about Austrian Galicia referring to Galicia --Stoni 00:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But check about how many pages link to Galicia (Central Europe) and Galicia (Spain. The number of pages are about the same. --Hottentot 00:04, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

People in Galicia also write in Galician Wikipedia and and Spanish Wikipedia. For that reason there is only 476 articles linking to iberian Galicia compared to 425 about Central Europe. Also 90% of the links to Galicia were about iberian/spanish/the kingdom of Galicia. There are also other historic reasons that I think you don't care about. --Stoni 00:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You just said the reason why Galicia should remain a disambig page. 425 link to the Central European region, and 476 articles link to the iberian Galicia article. Those numbers are close. --Hottentot 00:42, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Galicia

		An Award
		Very good Stoni! I've just seen what you have done with Kingdom of Galicia and Portugal, Kingdom of Galicia, Gallaecia, History of Galicia and the History of Galicia box series. My deepest congratulations. I was going to propose that something along those lines should be done, but you were ahead of me the whole time. For your work in bringing up the quality of Galician articles I award you the Barnstar of National Merit. The Ogre 17:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Galician portal

Thanks for the invitation. I'm from Argentina, currently at Madrid. My grandfather was a (true) gayego from Pontevedra Province, and I was always fond of my heritage. I'll try to contribute, nut don't expect a lot from me :-) Saúdos, User:Ejrrjs says What? 15:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Grazas pola mensaxe, o meu inglés non é moi bo, podo entendelo pero xa escribir artigos longos e outra cuestión, si fixen hai tempo un artigo sobre un concello galego: Abadín, Lugo, podo facer cousas dese estilo, o que si me parece moi interesante é o do portal sobre Galicia, axudará a dar a coñecer ao noso país no mundo anglosaxón, felicitacións pola iniciativa, saúdos.--Rocastelo 15:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. I'll try to do my best. Jfreyre

Hey there. I'm quite new here, I'm actually working on some new articles for the english wikipedia about benposta and their circus and founder, I'm afraid that'll take a lot. User:OPeixe

Please if you are interested put your name at participants list. --Stoni^(talk) 14:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Galicia

Y digo yo....siendo tú español...y siendo yo español...¿¿no sería más cómodo hablar en español?? En fin...mi inglés es el de un alumno de 3º de ESO un poco aventajado, así que poco podré hacer, de todas formas gracias por la invitación. Reignerok 17:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yo soy brasileño y mi español es muy malo. Porque pensas que puedo ajudar en WikiProyecto de Galiza? No entiendo nada de lá. Pero, onde puder ajudar, yo ajudo. Solo me diga aonde. --Slade | ^PT 18:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of Celtic Gaelleica

Hi Stoni, i've been working on The Celtic History of Galicia, as you can see on the article "History of Galicia", I'm still working on the Roman Period (I'm working on some maps and images, and I'm tryng to expand the article) but I need your help, the article it's too long and we'll have to split it on some subarticles, but I don't know how to do it... mainly 'cause i'm just a newbie ;)

And last but not least, I want to work with you in all Historical Items in the Galician project.

My best Regards.

20:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for the news!

Thank you. I will communicate the new to the other representative users in our wikipedia. --Agremon 10:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article

Just to inform you that an article you've edited before (History of Portugal (1777-1834)) is nominated for featured article. If you want you can vote or comment here. Thanks. Gameiro 04:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ignacio_Ramonet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ignacio_Ramonet.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Vigo Flag.gif

An image that you uploaded, Image:Vigo Flag.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Jesse Viviano 23:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the source web page had a copyright notice on it, so I do not believe that this is public domain. Jesse Viviano 23:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anxo Quintana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anxo Quintana.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 03:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:La Opinión A Coruña Front.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:La Opinión A Coruña Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Álvaro_Cunqueiro.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Álvaro_Cunqueiro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Butseriouslyfolks 04:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pescanova_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pescanova_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for commons:Image:Benito Jerónimo Feijoo.jpg

Thanks for uploading commons:Image:Benito Jerónimo Feijoo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Conscious 07:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Manuel Rivas.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Manuel Rivas.jpg, which you've sourced to "Promotional image". I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:A Nosa Terra Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:A Nosa Terra Front.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial General Intelligence

Hi Stoni, I notice you are a computer scientist with an interest in artificial intelligence. I share your interest in AI, and just contributed my first article to Wikipedia on a new kind of artificial general intelligence technology developed by a company called SmartAction. Being a new Wikipedian, I made many mistakes, and got "jumped on" immediately :-) I have tried to improve my article in line with the criticisms, but I could use the help of someone with more experience in editing Wikipedia articles, who also has knowledge of AI. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Thank you! R001605 (talk) 21:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kingdom of Galicia and Portugal

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kingdom of Galicia and Portugal. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of Galicia and Portugal. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Kellner

I just sent you an email, but in case it does not get through to you, I thought I should write to you here, as well. I am hoping you can help me with the Friedrich Kellner article, to translate it into Galician. I have a condensed version of the English article that I can send to you (about 1500 words). Also, there is a Wikipedia version in both Spanish and Portuguese, if that would make it easier to then translate into Galician. Thank you, Scott --Rskellner (talk) 01:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Stoni! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 388 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Corina Porro Martínez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Can I request a page for a translation? AJona1992 (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:El Correo Gallego Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:El Correo Gallego Front.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:La Voz de Galicia Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:La Voz de Galicia Front.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Galicia Hoxe Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Galicia Hoxe Front.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:El Ideal Gallego Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:El Ideal Gallego Front.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Faro de Vigo Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Faro de Vigo Front.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Dear Stoni We are looking for someone who could tranlate into Galician and upload on WP this page. Can you help us ? Thanks and greetings from Italy--RiverTeifi (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baiona Shield.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baiona Shield.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Description of a Career

The article Description of a Career has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication whatsoever of being notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Galician bagpipe players

Category:Galician bagpipe players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BDD (talk) 22:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Vigo Shield.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Vigo Shield.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Redondela Shield.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Redondela Shield.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Galician Universities listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Galician Universities. Since you had some involvement with the Galician Universities redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ramon Parada.jpg

The file File:Ramon Parada.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of World Fishing Exhibition

The article World Fishing Exhibition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This non-notable trade show has been original research since it was written. No evidence that it is an encyclopedia topic. Sounds to me like promotion alone with trivial details like the number of square meters of display space.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Stoni. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deportivo de La Coruña (women), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cristina Martínez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

El Hierro Launch Centre‎

Hello. This sentence at El Hierro Launch Centre‎ is not clear. Could you explain to me the meaning, so I can rephrase it?.

"In 2015 te project has been recovered as PLD Space since plans to launch a new rocket and made an agreement with INTA to help them find a place to launch."

Tambien hablo Castellano, si es mas facil para usted expresarse asi. Rowan Forest (talk) 17:55, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe "In 2015, the project was resumed because PLD Space plans to launch a new rocket and reached an agreement with INTA to help them find a launch site." In Spanish it would be "En 2015, el proyecto se retomó debido a que PLD Space planea lanzar un nuevo cohete y alcanzó un acuerdo con INTA para ayudarlos a encontrar una ubicación para el lanzamiento." Feel free to rephrase it. I have to review everything later. Reasearch took a while, I was exhausted, and still haven't found everything. One article says that detailed blueprints were published (prabably in paper) but I was unable to find them. --Ramon Antonio Parada (talk) 18:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll let you work on it and sometime later this week I could go over some minor cleanup. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Dockyard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of A Coruña Shield.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of A Coruña Shield.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elliott p.333

Ola Stoni.

Unha duda: Cando en "The Siege of Coruña" pos Elliott p.333 como referencia [1], a que te refires exactamente?

Graciñas, un saúdo e a seguir. --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 09:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GNSS Service Centre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GNSS Service Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/GNSS_Service_Centre. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Puddleglum ^2.0_{(How's my driving?)} 19:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GNSS Service Centre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GNSS Service Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/GNSS_Service_Centre, https://insidegnss.com/spaceopal-taking-over-maintenance-of-european-gnss-service-centre/, and http://www.gsa.europa.eu/news/european-gnss-service-centre-open-help-users. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ToeFungii (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:USC Shield.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:USC Shield.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FinisTerrae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haswell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gando Air Base

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gando Air Base requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://triptoairport.blogspot.com/2017/08/car-hire-alicante-airport-spain.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 22:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gran Canaria Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gando Air Base

Hi Stoni, great to see an article on Spanish air bases. To make your life easier and develop a sr=tndardised format you might like to use Template:WPAVIATION creator for your aviation articles. I personally use it for all my articles as it removes the grind of typing out the format and allows one to get on with the nitty-gritty.Pete--Petebutt (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GNSS Service Centre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GNSS Service Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNSS Service Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 07:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Port of Vigo 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Port of Vigo 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Vigo-Peinador.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vigo-Peinador.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 21st-century Galicia

The article 21st-century Galicia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marked unreferenced for over a decade and still no source provided. The content does not seem to be written in an encyclopedic tone, and not enough content is present to justify a full article. Should be merged into History of Galicia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]