Talk:Manzanita

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Redirecting to Manzanita

Part of Cal Poly Pomona's California Flora Project Biologycpp 21:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My reference books (primarily "The Jepson Manual", ISBN 0-520-08255-9, or Jepson online, which is offline tonight) considers Manzanita to be a common name for all of Arctostaphylos. The bearberries are considered manzanitas, look at ITIS for example. Common names are a bit tricky, more so than scientific names, but I don't see why Arctostaphylos and Manzanita should have seperate pages. There are subgenera and sections of Arctostaphylos mentioned in the Jepson Manual, but the difference is not manzanita vs bearberry. I did merge some of Arctostaphylos into manzanita before doing the redirect.

Note that each species which has a common name under the ITIS listing mentions manzanita.

If Manzanita is a subgenus, please specify the subgenus. Are you referring to the Arctostaphylos or Micrococcus subgenus? Perhaps there are other subgenera outside of California. My reference only covers California species. I have added a small amount of information on subgenera and sections to the Arctostaphylos page, but it would be nice for the manzanita and bearberry pages to be consist with the biological pages.

At the very least, the manzanita page needs to mention that manzanita is a common name which applies to all Arctostaphylos. One of the problems with common names is that their usage differs, and may be inconsistent.

Today is the first time I've ever heard anyone apply the name 'manzanita' to Arctostaphylos uva-ursi. Try talking about 'manzanita' to a botanist working in e.g. the Scottish Highlands, and you'll get blank looks, mention 'bearberry', and he'll know exactly what's meant. I suspect the same would apply in Canada and the eastern US. - MPF 23:14, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

That's the problem with common names. In the Western US, uva-ursi is just another kind of manzanita, and is better known by its species name than as "bearberry". In addition to the scientific literature, (like the Jepson manual), The Western Garden Book, which is pretty much the bible for amature horticulture in the western US, lists it as a manzanita, although it does mention its common name.

I just edited this section, to change the inaccurate discussion on landscaping usage, and (before reading this discussion) referenced uva ursi. It is difficult to talk intelligently about the manzanitas as a group while arbitrarily segregating some of them as a "subgenus." Is there any scientific reference justifying the subgenus categorization?

manzanita bark

why is the bark on a manzanita plant so unusual--a mix between dead wood and shiny maroon covering? thanks69.167.57.22 09:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)gregg[reply]

Many species of tree will be partially dead throughout their lifetimes. Some of the oldest trees in existence (several thousand years old) are mostly dead snags. Some of the biggest trees in existence (like sequoia) are mostly dead wood (the heart of the tree dies after a few hundred years, so that it no longer needs nutrients, yet remains firm (which is why heart wood of giant trees is excellent building material, it takes a long time to rot)). Manzanita happens to have a very high contrast between the live bark and dead flesh, as well as having the dead sections mostly as external branches and sections. Also, it only takes a few years for the dead bark to change color. -- As for why the bark is maroon, good question. It also sheds very oddly. Splarka (rant) 13:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Manzanita Trailer Park

There once was "temporary student housing" at Stanford University that wasn't very temporary. But they were built only for temporary use (Quickly and cheaply, if I understand correctly).

Jorge Cham's comic mentions a first hand account of the park (which may have some artistic license taken with it, but apparently not much according to the other articles I found) and shows why I bring this up at all. you may have to email him for more info, because I don't know if it's 23 years or 25. (If the halls were opened right away, if the trailer park was still needed, etc. would make a difference in that.)

Another reference, mentioning the year they were constructed (1969), and that, when a replacement dorm came, very few charities and organizations were willing to take the trailers free of charge when Stanford offered them...

This article refers to it, and talks about its replacement.

--M Scott 09:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not worth mentioning here. If at all, it could be mentioned in Stanford University, maybe. Splarka (rant)

Larb?

There is a redirect to this page from "Larb (Ute Tobacco)" but no content on the page to support the redirect. What up wit dat? 67.164.125.7 (talk) 05:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See section Kinnickinnick below re smoking. If there are no objections I will add the info, & tie in "Ute tobacco" provided I can source it. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few errors on this entry. The image of the bark is Arbutus menziesii but Manzanita is in reference to Arctostaphylos. In Canada Manzanita are only used for Arctostaphylos. Arbutus are not "Madrona" but Arbutus as a common name on this side of the border. Madrona is sometimes used for both Arctostaphylos & Arbutus on the US side of the border.

I haven't edited a page before so if someone can correct these errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Growinit (talk • contribs) 19:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kinnickinnick

Uva-ursi leaves are used by some First Nations/Native Americans both for ceremonial smudging and in the smoking mixture Kinnickinnick, see Bearberry. I propose adding a brief mention in the Medicinal Herb section; while it's not quite medicinal, it hardly seems worth a separate section for Ceremonial/recreational use. I hesitate because afaik use is confined to the one species, and in view of the discussion above re familiarity/usage of bearberry vs manzanita it might be confusing. If anyone knows of similar use of other Manzanita spp. it would help -- I'll dig a little myself. I'll watch this space for a few days before going ahead. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 22:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]