Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reich

Add to this deletion debate

Dicdef in its purest form. — Timwi 03:09, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• This isn't even a stub, and it has an almost three year edit history. The article speaks of the several historical Reichs in Germany. More proof that "dictionary definition" is a poor excuse for deleting any article. Smerdis of Tlön 04:20, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - I'd like to know what dictionaries you're reading that have 4 paragraph histories of the words, Timwi. The word reich has enough historical significance in the English language to justify a page. -- Cyrius 05:39, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. If you have a copy of that dictionary, I'd pay whatever you're asking. Meelar 06:03, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. I like the idea of being able to find out how the word was used (and abused) by various parties over the years, without having to wade thru the entire history of Germany, or even Nazi-ism. Certainly has plenty of info that doesn't belong in a dictionary. Niteowlneils 06:06, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a good article. -- Friedo 06:08, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Niteowlneils' comments. -- ChrisO 09:51, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Taku 23:55, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)