Talk:Interstate Commerce Commission

Trains High‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Airline deregulation#Airline deregulation in the United States|Airline deregulation in the United States]] The anchor (#Airline deregulation in the United States) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Soop Dogg

I am not sure how this wiki software works so I will ask that someone else do this. Someone vandelised the article (reference to Soop Dogg). Can someone fix this? Thank You

Is this the united states or what?

This article needs more details, more history, etc. A transportation economist would be helpful.

"Is this the united states or what?" - yes. I also agree that the article needs more detail. What really irks me, is that there is no page for the act that created it. I dont really care too much about the commission itself, but the act and the events that precluded its creation, IE the big "Trusts" of the guilded age and public pressure to regulate them, and how that affected congress members. uberblue 03:26, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can links to the important acts that involved the ICC be included in this article -- for example, the Hepburn Act? I believe they were important in giving the ICC its powers. (There may be some mentioned already. I just did not see Hepburn, so I apologize if I am overlooking). Otherwise, a great article! Cheers. Jakswa 00:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely more information is needed about the background. As Gabriel Kolko has documented in Railroads and Regulation, 1877-1916, the railroads had been lobbying for such an act for years before it was finally passed, and then continued to lobby to get changes made in their favor. The result was that the ICC had the authority to set both minimum as well as maximum rates. I agree that acts such as Hepburn ought to be included in the overall project, with perhaps a synopsis on this page and a separate page of their own. Ehusman 02:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it would be really great to include (in a straightforward way) the Acts following the ICA that changed the scope and powers of the ICC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.15.30.1 (talk) 11:28, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

I would agree, the article seems very biased that this was to suppress prices. However, it does briefly and primarily reference banning rebates, ie, lowering of rates. This would seem to be purpose of all federal legislation to ban competiting industries from the larger players who are less competitive. Why would they ban lowering of prices as their primary act? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.44.158 (talk) 02:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citation error in Interstate Commerce Commission wikipedia entry

Hello --

The link for one of the cases cited in the Interstate Commerce Commission article, Mitchell v. US, takes the reader to the wrong case. The correct citation is 313 US 80 (1941).

Cheers,

138.238.107.141 (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Jay[reply]

image

There is a nice image at http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/3239317542/

If anyone can determine if it was published before 1923 (which is my hunch), then we could use it here. Kingturtle (talk) 12:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sponsor was Shelby Cullom of Illinois

Information is available in national archive of its establishment under the chair Senator Cullom http://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-07-interstate-commerce.html Mulp (talk) 08:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Quote

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't corperate lawyer Richard Olney point out that, not the Attorney General of the time period? If someone could factcheck this.... 74.68.98.203 (talk) 03:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading paragraphs removed

I've removed the following paragraphs from the "Creation" section:

Equally significant, the Elkins Act required that rates be published. Eventually, when this piece of (economic) anti-discrimination legislation was constitutionally challenged, the United States Supreme Court ruled it to be constitutional.^[1] And significantly (for the future of anti-discrimination legal challenges), the Court founded its ruling upon the existence of the then-new 14th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, and its equal protection clause.

In the Supreme Court's view, the U. S. Congress through legislation could outlaw an act of (economic) discrimination against an individual or corporation if the act of discrimination constituted for the affected person(s) a failure by the discriminator to afford the affected person(s) the equal application (protection) of the rules or laws.

Two main problems here: first, the citation leads the reader to the Munn v. Illinois case, which the Supreme Court decided in 1876 - eleven years before the ICC was created. The paragraph makes it sound like this case happened after the ICC came into being.

Second, the citation makes no sense because the sentence is discussing the Elkins Act, which was passed by Congress in 1903. The Fourteenth Amendment, also referred to, was adopted in 1868. So this information is all jumbled up and incorrect as written. I'm posting it here for future reference in case another editor wants to try straightening things out. Textorus (talk) 07:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113

Inappropriate references in article

The article now says "The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) was a regulatory agency in the United States created by the pornstars of america", "i have to pee" and "dominic has ebola." Some of the original content was deleted. Not sure how to edit the article, but thought I would bring it up here in case anyone else knows how to fix it.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Drury, George H. (1994). The Historical Guide to North American Railroads: Histories, Figures, and Features of more than 160 Railroads Abandoned or Merged since 1930. Waukesha, Wisconsin: Kalmbach Publishing. pp. 164–166. ISBN 0-89024-072-8. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate Commerce Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061016100632/http://www.beardbooks.com/railway_problems.html to http://www.beardbooks.com/railway_problems.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate Commerce Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125055556/http://womensmemorial.org/Education/BHMSys.html to http://www.womensmemorial.org/Education/BHMSys.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New para re:ICC's commitment of E Moody Boynton to a lunatic asylum--in correct place?

Hello--I added a paragraph under the heading "Criticism" to describe the story of the ICC's 3-month commitment of E Moody Boynton, inventor of a potential new entrant RR system, to a lunatic asylum. Not sure this is in the right spot in the article or it deserves better transition or the heading should be expanded a bit. Thanks Riverbend Trail (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113

[1]