Talk:Cement

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Top‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Climate change High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

New page Alternatives to Cement

There are quite a few more alternatives to cement than are listed in the section here. I think it justifies its own page. Nellas Galadhon (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add them here then propose a split Chidgk1 (talk) 14:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not exclusively roman

We have example of hydraulic cement after the fall of Rome and before the advent of Portland cement. In Znachko-Iavorskii, I.L., New Methods for the Study and Contemporary Aspects of the History of Cementing Materials. Technology and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1977 the author describes a great deal of hydraulic lime mortar from all over the world before and after the fall of Rome, made from a startling variety of materials - things like egg whites, cheese and sour cream were used to achieve it. He has recipes from the high medieval period, and analysis of 11th century mortars that could set under water. These were not "weak pozzolans" - in many cases the different regional variations of hydraulic cement were superior to imported Portland cement in the 19th century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.95.143 (talk) 19:17, 2009 January 30 (UTC)

Environmental segregation and union

The article on Environmental impact of concrete repeats a lot of the content in this article, in the section on cement and environmental impact. I propose that that article be changed to Environmental impact of cement and concrete and that the substance of the matching section of the cement article be moved out and suitably united with the new article, together with any other material in other articles that match. I'd be willing to help if desired. Any comments? JonRichfield (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if you are still around Jon. Possibly interested Nellas Galadhon (talk) 18:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water Restive?

The article currently refers to some cements as having poor "water restive" qualities. Is that meant to be "poor water resistance"? Because in modern English "restive" means something like "impatient". IAmNitpicking (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130221105202/http://cee.mit.edu/cee-in-focus/2011/spring/cement-structure to http://cee.mit.edu/cee-in-focus/2011/spring/cement-structure

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cement#CO2_emissions

Shouldn't we mention Carbon8 Aggregates, CarbonCure and perhaps Solidia Technologies here ? It doesn't subtract CO2 from the environment (or at least I don't think so) but the first makes building materials by using the CO2 from the environment, the second one sells a system to inject CO2 into concrete and the last is a type of concrete that traps CO2. Genetics4good (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also maybe stuff from https://www.lc3.ch/ and https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-why-cement-emissions-matter-for-climate-change if someone has time to do it.Chidgk1 (talk) 07:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Greece have to be in the same section with Rome..

Let's separate those two. People shouldn't always associate Greece with the Romans and vice versa. Onoufrios d (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need for separation. They are together in this section because both employed pozzolans to produce hydraulic cement and concrete. Plantsurfer 11:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]