Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasüur
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 19:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a hoax. Google only finds one site that has ever heard of these beasts (and the text of this article is almost word-for-word identical to a forum post there). The other participants in this forum seem skeptical of the claims made there, too. I strongly suspect that this is a hoax (especially since elsewhere on the same site rasüur are described as funeral poetry for Malaysian nobles) and as such should be deleted. Kelly Martin 23:07, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The folks at poetry.tetto.org (the site Kelly Martin linked to) decided that Rasüur is a hoax, who are we to gainsay them? FreplySpang (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unverifiable and appears to be a hoax. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:19, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unverifiable. El_C 00:16, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Gotta admire the effort people go to in order to be funny with their hoaxes. Harro5 00:21, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Weak BJAODN candidate, the hoax gets less and less likely as the text progresses, and ends up with a quite ridiculous statement, which is pretty standard "gotcha" technique but quite well constructed here. That's not to say that fact is not often stranger than hoaxes, that very fact is what makes this sort of hoax funny. Andrewa 13:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.