Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rootian english
Rootian english, The result of the debate was Delete. [added by Andre🚐 22:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC) for afdstats]
Constructed language since 2004. No evidence of notability. Three Google hits (10 if you allow results from the same site), one of which looks less than relevant. - Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 15:18, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. Andre (talk) 15:27, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, actually I hoped to create notability thisway! Joris.82.168.78.5 16:04, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- That's not a good argument for keeping it; Wikipedia is to reflect what already is notable, not to create notability. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:10, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Yes. Notability first, Wikipedia afterward. - Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 17:53, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Can't vote if you don't have an account. Dr. Bacchus
- That's not a good argument for keeping it; Wikipedia is to reflect what already is notable, not to create notability. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:10, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable, advertising. --Fastfission 16:11, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable conlang. -Vina 18:11, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: I am overjoyed, to the point of happy tears, to see such an honest author. Most of them come along and swear (and swear to) notability, saying that at least 15 people on 12 continents speak the made up language, and it is a horrible conspiracy of academic elitism to pretend that this groundswell of linguistic innovation isn't at least as important as Finno-Ugaric. At least this fellow admitted it straight off. Good on him or her. Geogre 18:53, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Although his Web site is great fun to (try to) read, the language is not yet notable. --LeeHunter 19:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a place to make notability. --Improv 20:59, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, Improv has a good point —siroχo 22:05, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable (yet?). Good luck though. Nadavspi 00:28, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Micronations, antipopes, garage bands, software projects, & conlangs -- they all come to Wikipedia looking for free advertising. Keep looking. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:45, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Nonsense. jguk 22:25, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. As a language it is insignificant because nobody apart from the author and the idiot who wrote the article (same person perhaps?) speak it--Cynical 21:42, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, althought I'd love to see what exactly the changes are. As it stands, the vagueness of this article makes it sound more like an advertisement. Mo0 21:44, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)