User talk:Roy da Vinci/old

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
Remember to use a neutral point of view!
If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkTroll 02:01, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

WikiThanks

For your charitable action in fixing my signature, thus avoiding unnecessary stress on server and browser, and averting embarassment to moi, I offer you WikiThanks. — Xiong 熊 talk 23:19, 2005 Apr 11 (UTC)

Thank you

You know something, Roy, you're the rarest and best kind of newcomer. I've welcomed about 500 people, and have received fewer than 30 "thanks". You are the first to make a suggestion, no less such a very good one! :) I really appreciate it, and I'll add that in right now. (By the way, I like your signature)

If you have any questions, or need any kind of help or guidance, feel free to let me know. – Clockwork Soul 04:21, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

What do you think of this?

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Welcome, Roy da Vinci/old!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
Learn about some of the Wikipedia landmarks by trying our Wikipedia scavenger hunt!
If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
Wikipedia has a vibrant community of editors. The village pump is a great place to see the goings on.
Remember to use a neutral point of view!
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

{{Inca-stub}} and {{Inca-myth-stub}}

Hi Roy da Vinci - I note you've created two new stub templates. Did you realise that stub types should normally be cleared by Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting before creation? That way they can be vetted to check that there are a viable number of stubs (at least 60-100) and that the category does not cross the existing stub hierarchy before the stub is created.

If you can provide any information on why these stubs were created, please add a note to entry for these stubs at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria#Newly-discovered stub categories giving the reason for the stubs. In addition, if there is any Wikiproject associated with these stubs add that information. Thanks. --Allen3 ^talk 23:04, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

I've been too hasty, and too absorbed in my editing, and I apologize for rushing through the stub process. However, I still think at least one stub of this sort should stay. --ROY YOЯ 00:31, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi Roy - sorry to have to tell you this, but Inca-myth-stub's being deleted. However, there is a new group of myth-related stub templates, so the broader template of {{americas-myth-stub}} can be used for any inca mythology articles. Grutness...wha? 13:36, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rmurdoch.jpg

This image has been placed on Image Sleuthing. We want to know the source or any information to help us form a fair use claim. You claimed this image to be public domain. Can you provide a source for this image or give us any information to help back up this claim, or can you make a fair use claim? If we can't keep this image we will ask for it to be deleted. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 08:34, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The image's info and tag have been fixed. Yet again, I rushed through something important. Sorry for the trouble. --ROY YOЯ 16:00, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyen Cao Ky

Just so you know, page moves should never be done by copying and pasting from one article to another - the move function should be used. If you are unable to move an article then just post a message at WP:RM. I've now fixed the histories by merging them. Cheers, violet/riga (t) 18:44, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Allhelgonakyrkan.gif

I saw your picture, Image:Allhelgonakyrkan.gif, and i am 100 % sure that it isn't the church located in the Helgalund area, Stockholm. The Allhelgona church is a wooden church. Where did you get the picture from? Jordgubbe 15:05, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

File:Allhelgonakyrkan.gif

I did a check, it looks like the church in Lund. Moving to that article Zeimusu | (Talk page) 23:20, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Biological warfare

Noticed your edit regarding bio warfare incidents against American Indians. FYI. A number of discussion pages in Wiki periodically debate this ever controversial issue. See User:Kevin Myers' edit history on the Smallpox article and his excellent work on Pontiac's Rebellion. He also recently completed an extensive rewrite to Population history of American indigenous peoples. Chime into the discussion pages if you have good sources on these issues. They seem to be few and far between. Comments welcome. WBardwin 04:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

template ll nominated for deletion

Hi - You might want to visit Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion. Someone has nominated template:ll (which you created a while ago) for deletion. -- Rick Block (talk) July 1, 2005 23:29 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. --ROY YOЯ 2 July 2005 01:07 (UTC)

Some people don't know how to do links - really?

Why go to the trouble to write scandinavian when (presumably by design), scandinavian produces exactly the same external effect and is a much more convenient syntax. If you don't look at the source, you will not be able to tell what the distinction is. --Red King 5 July 2005 23:14 (UTC)

Is there a problem? As far as I can tell, you are saying that I should have optimised the Scandinavia link by changing [[Scandinavia|Scandinavian]] to [[Scandinavia]]n. But since that seems to be exactly what I did, I'm afraid I don't know what you are getting at. --ROY YOЯ 6 July 2005 00:19 (UTC)

Yes, there's a problem. I can't tell my left from my right! I "decided" that you had undone what I did, when actually you had redone what I did... (scandinavian). I confused the new column and the old column. I will now go away and write out 100 times "I must not jump to conclusions", followed by another 100 lines "if it is my bed time, I will stop editing". --Red King 6 July 2005 10:09 (UTC)

American

Thanks Roy for approaching me. Since I wasn't sure what you wanted, I created a temporary file at User:Acjelen/Temp/American with some changes I would like to make to the current article American. As you will note, this includes section titles, a few additional comments on the wide use of the narrow sense of American, and restored text on the obsolete "American Race". My main concern is that some editors of this article will want to exclude the narrow sense and other editors will want to excluse the broader sense. Many people of the United States are surprised about, and even angry over, the debate. Conversely, many people of the Americas have equally strong feelings. Another concern I have is that this article and the discussion of the usage debate should not devolve into anti-Americanism, racism, jingoism, or political globalism. Finally, I dislike editors making universal statements about what "everyone" or "all" the people of a particular place do, say, feel, or want. I hope this helps. Tell me what you'd like to see. -Acjelen 06:03, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Roy, on further reflection, I've changed my mind. Please see American and Use of the word American. Please feel free to make any changes you wish. -Acjelen 02:22, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chichén Itzá vs Chichen Itza

Hi. See Talk:Chichen Itza for discussion on why the article is at the unaccented rendering-- in short, because the name is Maya, not Spanish. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 12:16, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pre-Columbian America

Hi! I'm interested to know what your ideas are for this wikiproject. I don't know if I could help much, but I'd try to lend a hand. I'm also concerned that indigenous languages and cultures in the Americas (as well as those in Africa and Australasia) don't have much representation on Wikipedia, yet. I'm sure it will change. Anyway, keep up the good work! Chamdarae 00:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Templates' purpose

Help me out here: what should we be using templates for, rather than this? I'm still a newbie to template world, that's why I made this one.

If I understand it right, templates are to be used for content whose layout is likely to change frequently (or upon agreement), and which needs to be kept consistent across the wiki. Example - if we were to put a different NPOV notice everytime, whatever we fancy it to be, usability would suffer. So we use {{npov}} to carry the same semantics, but details of implementation improvable at will. Your {{ll}} template didn't serve this purpose, since a centralized change in it would do no good unless (nearly) all language pages were renamed - clearly infeasible. But I'm too lazy to find a reference that backs me on this. User:logixoul 21:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Imperialism.jpg

Hello. You uploaded this image in February. I was wondering if you know the original source of it. Someone asked on the help desk and we're trying to figure out who published the carton. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 09:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I was cryptic above. :) It's not a problem. We had a question from a person who wants to use it in research for a publication, but wants to know the source. Anything you could tell us would be great. That's all. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 23:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ecotower.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecotower.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 05:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I could not find information on the license, but I justified it for fair use.ROY YOЯ

Image copyright problem with Image:Webb3.50.73mi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Webb3.50.73mi.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 08:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Imperialism.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Imperialism.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Avatar-en 13:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

I seem to have a problem with loading random pictures illegally. Sorry. If there is another one without a license, maybe it's better to just take it off and find a different one.ROY YOЯ 02:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Inti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Inti.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Church_mdrayton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Church_mdrayton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:40, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]