Talk:National Health Service (England)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Health Service (England) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 365 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

National Health Service (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service articles

England Top‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nursing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hospitals High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

National Health Service (England) logo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support from source

i wrote "In November 2022 a survey by Ipsos and the Health Foundation found just 8% of the public were satisfied with NHS England. Public support for UK government's handling of NHS in England drops to new low Sky News De Facto reverted it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Health_Service_%28England%29&diff=1141131367&oldid=1141127031 naintaining it was "Not supported by the source"

The source states "Only 8% of those surveyed thought the government had appropriate plans for the NHS; the previous low was 22% in 2006. The survey, from Ipsos and the Health Foundation, revealed those in Scotland and Wales had more confidence in their devolved governments' policies, at 28% and 19% respectively."

I don't see a problem with the source. Proxima Centauri (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Proxima Centauri, did you read my edit summary?

Read and compare:

Source says: 8% of those surveyed thought the government had appropriate plans for the NHS
Proxima Centauri wrote: 8% of the public were satisfied with NHS England

Have you spotted the differences now? -- DeFacto (talk). 15:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A NATIONAL Health Service?

Considering that the health service was set up for the whole UK - and given that the text covered here repeats much of that in the main NHS article - are there any good reasons to have a separate National Health Service (England) article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.2.23 (talk) 08:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]