User talk:Adamrush

Archive 1 Beginning - 2007-07-25

Re:

MU means million units of power -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 01:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely means something, otherwise it would not have been there. Power generation and consumption in India is measured in terms of MUs. The definition of how the MU is calculated can be seen here. Thanks -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 14:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 31 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stora Istad wind park, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Wknight94 (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish wind farms

Good work with these articles, but I have to admit I'm curious about Lillgrund, which seems to be the largest by far... Johnfos (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join projects related to the Energy Portal

Hello Adamrush! You made some great contributions on energy related issues. I thought you might like to be aware of the opportunity to contribute to the energy portal. If you are able to help and wish to show your support (and to automatically add yourself to the list of Wikipedians plugged into the Energy Portal), you might also like to paste one of these user boxes onto your user page (according to your colour preference!):

Paste this text...

...to get this tag

This user is plugged into the Energy Portal.

Beagel (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rundata

Hi Adamrush. Would you mind taking a look at Rundata and checking if the latest edits by Bardcom are correct? This user is searching Wikipedia looking for instances of British Isles and replacing them with alternatives. His edits on this occasion may be valid, but a number of his changes are incorrect or questionable. I tried to check this one but got bogged down in the Swedish websites. However, in reading about the subject I note that there are stones located in the Isle of Man, and if the code BR does relate solely to Great Britain then these would be excluded. Thanks CarterBar (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adamrush, I've changed the text to read "British Islands" as being the correct reference to all of the area covered by [BR]. The editor CarterBar is being very disingenuous in his description by stating that I am "replacing with alternatives" as if there are not good reasons for these changes. The term "British Isles" is used incorrectly in a great number of article (this being one), and many editors are not aware of how to use the term correctly. The code [BR] in this instance cannot refer to "British Isles" as there is a seperate code [IR] used for Ireland. In addition, there are ASCII files and spreadsheets available to download that contain all of the data, and from this it is clear that there is a distinction made between the two. --Bardcom (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re2

Thanks. Another editor has advised me about the section headings. I've stopped making that error. Thank you anyway for your advice. I had edited the Hortence de Beauharnais article before I received the message.jeanne (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Råshön wind farm

I have nominated Råshön wind farm, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Råshön wind farm. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Schuym1 (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Schuym1 (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Harald Damsleth

On 6 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harald Damsleth, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of China Uncensored

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on China Uncensored requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pyrusca (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Adamrush. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Adamrush. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Adamrush. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Adamrush. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"KB!" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect KB!. Since you had some involvement with the KB! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Connecticuit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Connecticuit. Since you had some involvement with the Connecticuit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Mysterious Two" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mysterious Two. Since you had some involvement with the Mysterious Two redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 12:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cero en conducta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cero en conducta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cero en conducta

Hello, Adamrush. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cero en conducta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Turkish prison" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Turkish prison and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 4#Turkish prison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Havradim (talk) 00:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abbi Jacobson edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Abbi Jacobson. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published source. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi Adamrush! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kathleen's bike (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Diane Ladd. Thank you. Kathleen's bike (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]