This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of altered states of consciousness on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness articles
Hi all, I'm wondering if we can misconsider the banner pic to better illustrate the experience. the current pic shows the 'epemeral body' leave the physical body, when in fact the experience is one of an 'person's essence' (my words) leave the body. an essence certainly not bound by the shape and size of the physical body. the 'essence' (my word) just is. it has no obvious definitive size/shape parameters Jres11 (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If it "just is" and has no "obvious definitive size/shape parameters", how would you depict it? And what does "epemeral" mean? TheScotch (talk) 20:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article states that a patient called “Maria” reported an OBE. I’ve not found any evidence so far that this “Maria” ever publicly identified herself or made any public statement about her alleged experience. It seems to me from what I’ve read that “Maria” herself might easily be a fabrication of Kimberly Clark’s. Maybe not, but shouldn’t the article say that Kimberly Clark is the one reporting the OBE (even though she alleges that “Maria” experienced it)? On the other hand, if there really is any concrete evidence that this “Maria” existed (other than Clark’s say-so) and spoke of an OBE as Clark described, shouldn’t that evidence be referenced in this Wikipedia article? TheScotch (talk) 14:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The story of ´Maria´ was already examined. It was found that a free view to the window where the shoe was - was possible when ill persons are transported by an ambulance to the clinic. Therefore the knowledge about a show outsid a window was not supernatual. But the access to the hospital was rebuilt later into another construction. Thus when the story of ´Maria´ was written down - it was not considered that the shape of the building has changed meanwhile - and this was the reason why the fake-story was invented, that this must have been an supernatural event of a soul-travel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F2:5F3C:A812:AD79:B7BB:8F08:15D4 (talk) 14:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
at the very end of the first section, there are 8 citations, most (three references to a "Blanke O") with different sources. i was just wondering if only 2 or 3 cites would be enough to do what was intended, as 8 footnotes are quite protruding. valerie frostcrush (talkpage) 15:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=small}
