Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Ullman
Ricky Ullman was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep.
Another apparently lost/orphaned VfD nom, as it doesn't appear to have ever been posted to the main page, and has no voting page. Tagged November 21. Procedural/keep--10 works listed at IMDb--not bad for an actor that's only 18 years old. (next stop should be cleanup, unless it gets cleaned up during the voting period.) Niteowlneils 02:35, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, for reasons above. I've added some details. Andrewa 03:44, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: it could be better, and in particular the lead rings all the vanity bells, but the boy has done what the article says. Geogre 05:32, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Niteowlneils, I'm not knocking the wonderful work you're doing but why not just take the headers off the old ones and leave them be? If someone really wants them gone they can list them properly. Where there has been a foulup, such as with the Polish coats of arms, it's fair enough, but.Dr Zen 05:48, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep I wikified the existing text, but it definitely needs some work. DCEdwards1966 05:50, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, notable young actor, I'll add it to my personal Young Celeb Project for improvement if I can find some additional info on the guy. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 12:35, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, a noteworthy young actor. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 15:37, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. He has a pretty good filmography for somebody his age. --Idont Havaname
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.