User talk:Carol Fenijn
Hey Flyingbird :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.
Some links that may be of use:
- Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers
- Wikipedia:How to edit a page
- Wikipedia:Village pump - ask questions you may have here, or leave a message on my talk page
Keep contributing :) Dysprosia 12:56, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Thanks Dysprosia! I'll mostly work on the Dutch wikipedia, there is far more work to do there, but every now and then I can add a bit here, as well. :-) Flyingbird 16:13, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I'm working on the jackfruit article with you (hope I'm being helpful 8^)). It would be beneficial if you added something short about how the jackfruit chips are produced. That is, are they dried, freeze-dried; are they like dried fruit are really like "chips" (which are flat and crunchy in the US; like fries in the UK)? Maybe it says on the bag how they are made? - Marshman 19:14, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- Hi Marshman, I wish I could add information on how jackfruit chips are produced, but I am just a consumer, and the bag just says it is baked in vegetable oil, I guess it usually is, and it contains 15% of the daily requirement of vitamin C. Flyingbird 20:23, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Image:Kos_roman_amphitheater.jpg
[edit]Actually, the image shows a theater, not an amphitheater. Additionally, it is not a Roman theatre, but a Greek one. To avoid confusion it would be nice if could change the file name --Enlil2 17:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Gibraltar_en.jpg
[edit]Hello there,
I was just reading Wikipedia:Image use policy and noticed that your Media:Gibraltar_en.jpg picture does not fully comply with the policies. It would be great if you could remove all the text from the pictures (credits should go on the image description page), and upload high resolution versions (the thumb option of Wikipedia's image syntax can be used for displaying low resolution versions of them the article) of the three separated pictures, rather than the three joined in one.
Your images are nice and help the Gibraltar article, but I hope you understand that having the credits hardcoded in the picture and having them joined in one low resolution image makes Wikipedia look somewhat unprofessional. Don't take it personally I mean no offense :). Tell me what you think. Regards, xDCDx 00:28, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Hi xDCDx, in the future, I will include pictures in a different way indeed. Meanwhile, feel free to improve/correct this one, or even remove it if you have a better alternative. Maybe some day I'll give it a try myself. Cheers. Flyingbird 08:05, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- FYI, I've removed the images from Strait of Gibraltar as they are, also, far from compliant with wikipedia norms. --Tagishsimon
- That's ok, see the note above, I'll do it differently next time. (I do regret that most people do not put at least the string 'wikipedia' and their username in small letters on each picture, btw.) Flyingbird 19:49, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Image:Coster_nl, Coster_en.jpg
[edit]Hi Flyingbird,
I took the liberty to replace the images of Laurens Janszoon Coster on the Dutch and English wikipedia's with a brighter version. I hope that's okay with you -- the original ones were really quite dark. I've kept the originals where they were but they are no longer used in the article.
Regards, Guus 17:13, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Hi Guus, that is fine! Thanks! Flyingbird 08:05, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
[edit]Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Parkiet.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Parkiet.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Right now, I'll put it as unverified, but change it to what it's supposed to be when you get a chance. Thanks, Mattingly23 16:13, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Same with Image:Algeciras 3en.jpg, although that's just some holiday pictures, as you say. --Ricky81682 (talk) 08:12, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I overlooked it, I just added a gfdl tag to both! Cheers. Flyingbird 04:40, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | The image Image:Ag nikolaos 3en.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information. |
Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 11:01, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
Similar to the discussion regarding pictures as above, please reload 3 separate images without hardcoded copyright caption to comply with wiki image-use guidelines. I could do it myself but we would lose the lower part of each image. If you no longer have the uncaption version of the image that is probably what would have to be done or exclude the image all together. For the time being I have added a temporary caption on the Tarifa page so that the image could align better. Thanks. --Kvasir 12:34, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Hi, I do not have time for this, feel free to remove the pictures or to improve them in any way, sorry. Flyingbird 17:45, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Cambridge 3en.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Thuresson 17:07, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oops, I am too late for that, it was GNU-FDL, I apparently forgot to mention that. I may upload it at a later point, when I'll have more time. Thanks for notifying me!! Flyingbird 13:42, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Image:Lago di lugano.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lago di lugano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 04:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Algeciras 3en.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Algeciras 3en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 22:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Rosetta stone en.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rosetta stone en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:Strait of gibraltar en3.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Strait of gibraltar en3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:26_01_01.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:26_01_01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 16:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Shalom!
[edit]I'm trying to expand and bring the Eilat page up to date. From the history/talk pages you have been there too, so please come and see what we can do to make it even better. Thank you, Shir-El too 23:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Malaga 3.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Malaga 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 06:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
File:Haarlem 3 en.jpg missing description details
[edit]
File:Coster en.jpg missing description details
[edit]
File:Santorini 4en.jpg missing description details
[edit]
File:Haarlem 3 en.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haarlem 3 en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Coster en.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coster en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Haarlem 3 en.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Haarlem 3 en.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Coster_en.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Coster_en.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Santorini 4en.jpg missing description details
[edit]File:Tetouan 3en.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tetouan 3en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. εω (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Chersonissos 3en.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chersonissos 3en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. εω (talk) 01:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Couscous.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Couscous.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited El Jardí dels Ocells, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Catalan and Spanish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hitler has only one ball...
[edit]Given the edit summary "Please do not start an edit war here as well while the discussion is in progress" i would strongly suggest you read this article, where the Bold, Revert, Discuss-cycle is presented. Step one was yours, step two mine and I'm still waiting for you to engage in step three ("discuss"). Kleuske (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Kleuske, that article is not about one user reverting edits of another user on one language wikipedia which is undone, and then reverting similar edits on other language wikipedia's! It is better to discuss first and let the discussion settle down and then proceed! Carol Fenijn (talk) 14:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Vansen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Hui. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Thalthana has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thalthana has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)- Thanks SwisterTwister! Carol (Talk) 05:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Carol Fenijn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Carol Fenijn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Burp suite for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burp suite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burp suite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Grondemar 06:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Kwaci listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kwaci. Since you had some involvement with the Kwaci redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Carol Fenijn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Blakiston's Line) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Blakiston's Line, Carol Fenijn!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your very informative new article on Blakiston's Line. I see from your edit summaries that you are still working on it, so keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Carol Fenijn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blakiston's Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ainu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)