Talk:Witchaven

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Artwork

I notice the boxart is stolen from MobyGames. Can anyone obtain a copyright-free image? Cpc464 12:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Stolen"? The picture is added to wiki as "Fair Use" and MobyGames is credited as the source of the picture. Is there any particular reason I'm not aware of that is against the use of pictures from MobyGames? Besides, I don't think there are any copyright-free cover art pictures for the game: the copyright would always be owned by the game publisher/creator/etc... Berserker79 14:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Old article deletion discussion

from VfD:

non-notable, there are hundreds of first-person-rpg-shooter-games. nothing makes this one special. requesting removal. --Timecop 23:47, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Delete GaryNigel 00:00, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

GNAA trolling all the way around -- the creator of the article and the lister here. Keep the article. Rick K 00:14, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)

I say keep. WhisperToMe 06:49, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Weak keep. — Gwalla | Talk 18:14, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable. We are not Freshmeat. --Improv 21:52, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. -Sean Curtin 23:35, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
Keep valid topic. Passes the "Would an unabridged encyclopedia on X topic include this?" question if the "X" is for "video games." [[User:Davodd|DAVODD «TALK»]] 00:05, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I wanted to know what Witchaven was! This page helped! -TOGoS
Keep. Computer games are a valid topic. Just don't allow any fan-cruft substubs proliferate from this. jni 09:22, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep, I see no reason at all for deletion —siro χ o 05:57, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
Keep although it needs serious editing and wikification. BTW, shouldn't it be spelled Witchhaven? [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 08:30, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
Keep Perfectly valid article.--Tomheaton 12:40, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep Someone does need to keep track of it. Jsut make sure it's under the proper list --Asmodai 10:50, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
Keep, but clean up some. —tregoweth 17:40, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Nothing wrong with having articles about games. Factitious 06:19, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Intrigue 18:13, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. This FPS is unique in comparison to the many gun shooting FPSs. And of course its a licensed game. Deltasim (talk) 09:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

end moved discussion

Multiplayer

Am sure this game does multiplayer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andwan0 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]