User talk:Shadowolf

Welcome!

Hello, Shadowolf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 04:53, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

PRS Guitars image

Hello, friend. I'm concerned about the PRS Dragon pic you uploaded; I'm pretty sure it's under copyright. -Ikkyu2 01:40, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I got the pic from a PRS Guitars brochure (my dad had given it to me...he had two, I'm honestly not sure where he found 'em though), that housed various flyers on their various models. I figured it was promotional, but you could be right. If you want to be on the safe side and just remove the pic, you can. Thanks. Shadowolf 22:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PRS_Dragon.jpg has been listed as a possibly unfree image

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:PRS_Dragon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Riddler Image

I'm reposting the previous Riddler Image. Not trying to erase yours but you said you liked that one better. Just giving you a heads up. Dstorres

"Karl Grossman" or "Karl Grossmann"?

Hi Shadowolf,

with this edit you moved Karl Grossmann to Karl Grossman. May I inquire why? In the German article, asides from the differing spelling in title and text, they have a police picture of the time, saying "Carl Grossmann" (click to enlarge). Do you have any information on this matter? Since he was German, the spelling with two n would be very common ... -- marilyn.hanson 17:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marilyn.Hanson,

The articles that I have read, particularly by the Crime Library, spells his name in that manner. They also refer to him with his first name Georg instead of Karl/Carl - see here, here, and here. It's perfectly possible that the Crime Library have his name spelled wrong (I have found that the articles are all by the same author, after all). Now that I think about it, its best if we bring up reliable sources for whatever his actual name is. I did a search with your spellings and they seem just as noteworthy (I'm now seeing many, many different ways and combinations people are spelling it now...). We can use the other spellings to simply redirect to the correct name - but I think we should figure out which is his actual name first! The only picture I can find is the one in the German article... I can't read the name, it's too small for me. But I think we can use that name as the proper name; it seems like a legit enough picture. Thanks! -- Shadowolf 20:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edits

	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to MySpace in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. --JoeSmack ^Talk 07:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I am not a big fan of exceptions. WP:NOT for one thing would say MySpace is a social networking site and not an encyclopedic source. I've used myspace plenty; i don't think it would be hard to argue it is mostly full of non-encyclopedic stuff. Another reason: if the profile is hacked and something pernicious is put up in its place, wikipedia is potentially liable for holding a link to the material. Finally, most of all, it is almost summarily removed from articles at this point as per WP:EL and for my reasons and many others. The fact that other articles still contain the links doesn't exonerate others' use of myspace, I'm sorry. Please do not re-add the link. If you are interested in talking with people in full about this via IRC, the #wikipedia-spam-t channel is a great place to discuss which links are good to use and which aren't (i'd suggest logging in around 6pm-PST). JoeSmack ^Talk 09:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the quick reply! I'd argue that a regular website could just be as hacked (even if it may be more difficult), or any sort of vandalism could take place anywhere. Myspace isn't much different. I feel MySpaces are relevent to bands, and especially to a Wiki regarding a band as the sound of their music is right there. Its uniform design allows easy reading of updatable information as well. And some artists use their Myspace over a website completely (such as Chris Cornell). However, I understand where you are coming from, and I understand it is not really your say about this matter regardless, so I will try to clarify this issue upon the Wiki policy before attempting to re-insert it in some other day. Thanks for your help! -- Shadowolf 09:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for being cool about it. You're the best reaction I've had to link-reverting all day. :) JoeSmack ^Talk 09:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. I understand you're just following guidelines after all, and grudging conflicts never really lead to anywhere (at least for me!). Since Wikipedia is constantly changing, rules change, so I might eventually get it in later. It's not like Wiki is leavin' anytime soon, so there's a lot of time for that. ;) Thanks again. -- Shadowolf 09:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:B'z_band.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:B'z_band.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ArchangeXMen.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:ArchangeXMen.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Angelfish.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Angelfish.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kidneythieves-Zerospace.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Kidneythieves-Zerospace.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Baby Doll (Batman: The Animated Series)

I have nominated Baby Doll (Batman: The Animated Series), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Doll (Batman: The Animated Series). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 00:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 00:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kamau Kambon

AfD nomination of Kamau Kambon

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kamau Kambon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamau Kambon (2nd nomination). Thank you. Trickrick1985 (talk) 23:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kidneythieves-Zerospace.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kidneythieves-Zerospace.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SegaSwirl.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SegaSwirl.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kylun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kylun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]