Talk:Mythologies (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Continental Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Continental philosophy

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Creaturesofthewind.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semiology

Has it really never caught on?!? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Via strass (talk • contribs) 22:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The assertion sounded POV to me, and so I've removed it. Saussure's theories were very popular in France throughout the 1960s, and this is reason enough for my decision to remove the aforementioned assertion. --Le vin blanc (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely taught at University level in Britain. I did a module on semiology/semiotics for my English degree. --90.214.206.203 (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]