Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Jung
Appearance
Glowing tribute to someone whose main notability is involvement in some sort of unspecified bureaucratic fuss at the Campus Greens organization. He doesn't seem notable to me, and the article is also very POV given that the first page I find on Google [1] describes Jung as part of the problem. --LeeHunter 18:04, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Problem or solution, it's non-notable in any reasonable encyclopedic sense. This also reeks of vanity. Starblind 18:42, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity better suited for a user page (Userfy?). --Deathphoenix 19:23, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Subject not sufficiently notable, article is the first and so far only contribution by this IP and possible autobiography. The fuss is some time ago now, but obviously someone still feels it. Andrewa 19:47, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Smoddy | Talk 21:09, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity self-promotion. Wyss 22:49, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 00:29, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- "Adam was raised between his grandfather's farm and St. Joseph, MO" What, in a field somewhere? Not notable. Delete. RickK 00:32, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity, thy name is Jung.Weaponofmassinstruction 06:55, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)