Talk:Low church
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Ritualism
[edit]Missing from both this article and the one on Anglo-Catholocism (to which High Church Redirects) is any discussion of the manifestation of high and low theology in vestments, liturgy and decoration of the worship space.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.78.77.2 (talk • contribs) 15:18, July 29, 2004
Merge
[edit]I have merged the article Low Churchman into this one. aliceinlampyland 15:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC).
Low Church and Roman Catholic Church
[edit]The article could maybe find room for discussion about Low Church theological currents within non-Evangelical and non-Anglican Christianity. Since the Second Vatican Council and the constitution Dei Verbum, the Church has made a good deal of room for the study of the Scriptures, to the point where many Churchmen could at least in theory be called Low Churchmen. There is a good amount of information already in the article Evangelical Catholic. Similar comparisons could also be made with the Eastern Orthodox. While in practice these liturgical Churches are known for their high degree of ritualism, the High Church sensibility is not always required among all the clergy and laity. ADM (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Dubious assertion
[edit]"More traditional low church Anglicans, under the influence of Calvinist or Reformed thought inherited from the Reformation era, reject the doctrine that the sacraments confer grace ex opere operato (e.g. baptismal regeneration) and lay stress on the Bible as the ultimate source of authority in matters of faith necessary for salvation. "
Is this correct ? "Down-playing" or "de-emphasising" particular aspects of the doctrine is not the same as "rejecting".Eregli bob (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- Start-Class Christian theology articles
- Mid-importance Christian theology articles
- Christian theology work group articles
- Start-Class Anglicanism articles
- Top-importance Anglicanism articles
- WikiProject Anglicanism articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English