Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuker
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Stormie 09:16, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be a neologism, as I can't find any google hits relating to it. --InShaneee 20:17, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable jargon Cdc 01:43, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, neologism. Bart133 03:08, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, expand or merge with other warez related stuff. YannisKollias 14:37, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, well established term. bbx 15:11, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable jargon. GRider\talk 18:10, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. If we can keep an article on w00t or Pwn, I see no reason this cant stay. ALKIVAR™
21:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) - Keep. I ride for my nukers, I die for my nukers. —RaD Man (talk) 21:08, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, borderline. Megan1967 00:01, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. neologism, dicdef, minor aspect of minor Internet subculture. --BM 14:07, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Tautologous dictionary definition ("A 'nuker' is one who 'nukes'.") of a minor jargon term. Delete or Merge with warez. Uncle G 16:22, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)
- Keep with caution, but should likely be merged with warez, noting that the whole warez community encourages copyright violations. Do we make mention of that? I believe I read a policy discussion on "illegal activity promotion" a week or two ago. Did it become policy I wonder?Weaponofmassinstruction 23:14, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with warez. Gamaliel 18:50, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.