Talk:Esperanto music

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Speedy keep, 2012-02-13, see discussion.
no consensus to delete, 2012-02-05, see discussion.

Esperanto music is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles

Regional and national music

	Esperanto music is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Constructed languages: Esperanto Mid‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Esperanto task force.
	This article is an Esperanto core topic.

Objection to PROD

If someone wants to pursue deleting this, I've two reasons to want such a proposal to undergo discussion.

Greater reason: There are eight interwikis for this, some of which appear to be much more substantial than the English article. This suggests there is more to this topic than has thus far been said in the English article; and that, in turn, seems to me to suggest enough doubt to justify not deleting without discussion.
Lesser reason: Quite simply, I find this topic interesting. That's obviously not a reason not to delete, but frankly I do consider it a valid reason not to want it deleted without discussion.

--Pi zero (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD closed

This article was nominated for deletion; the result was no consensus to delete. The discussion may be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperanto music. bd2412 T 22:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement

I'm glad this article didn't get deleted. It had been on my to-do list of articles to work on, though not a high priority.

German Wikipedia has pretty decent and well-sourced article on the topic that could be used as basis for improving the English Wikipedia article. The French and Spanish Wikipedia articles aren't bad either, though they lack citations. If I do this myself, my approach would be to translate the French Wikipedia article, check it against the article on German Wikipedia, add sources, and then work from there.

Floréal Martorell also has an article on the history of Esperanto music, "Esperanto-muzik-kulturo. Ĉu mito aŭ realo?". I wish I could find better documentation on the early history of musical culture in the Esperanto community, but this should help some.

Most of the articles the Esperanto music article links to were speedily deleted on 3 Feb 2012 citing CSD A7 or A9 "no indication of importance", a few were deleted later. Most of these could be restored the same way, by working from better articles on other Wikipedias.

I guess I should get to translating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naŋar (talk • contribs) 22:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry SineBot. And I wanted to add, any help would be appreciated. Naŋar (talk) 22:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]