Jump to content

Tube sound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Tubes vs transistors)
Vacuum tubes glowing inside the preamp section of a modern guitar amplifier

Tube sound (or valve sound) is the characteristic sound associated with a vacuum tube amplifier (valve amplifier in British English), a vacuum tube-based audio amplifier.[1] At first, the concept of tube sound did not exist, because practically all electronic amplification of audio signals was done with vacuum tubes and other comparable methods were not known or used. After introduction of solid state amplifiers, tube sound appeared as the logical complement of transistor sound, which had some negative connotations due to crossover distortion in early transistor amplifiers.[2][3] However, solid state amplifiers have been developed to be flawless and the sound is later regarded neutral compared to tube amplifiers. Thus the tube sound now means 'euphonic distortion.'[4] The audible significance of tube amplification on audio signals is a subject of continuing debate among audio enthusiasts.[further explanation needed][5]

Many electric guitar, electric bass, and keyboard players in several genres also prefer the sound of tube instrument amplifiers or preamplifiers. Tube amplifiers are also preferred by some listeners for stereo systems.[further explanation needed]

Playing dynamics with an electric guitar and a tube overdrive
Demonstration of the dynamics on electric guitar with a tube overdrive set to a crunch sound. Barely touching the strings produces an almost clean sound; harder playing results in distortion.
Problems playing this file? See media help.

History

[edit]

Before the commercial introduction of transistors in the 1950s, electronic amplifiers used vacuum tubes (known in the United Kingdom as "valves"). By the 1960s, solid state (transistorized) amplification had become more common because of its smaller size, lighter weight, lower heat production, and improved reliability. Tube amplifiers have retained a loyal following amongst some audiophiles and musicians. Some tube designs command very high prices, and tube amplifiers have been going through a revival since Chinese and Russian markets have opened to global trade—tube production never went out of vogue in these countries.[further explanation needed] Many transistor-based audio power amplifiers use MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) devices in their power sections, because their distortion curve is more tube-like.[6]

Musical instrument amplification

[edit]

Some musicians[7] prefer the distortion characteristics of tubes over transistors for electric guitar, bass, and other instrument amplifiers. In this case, generating deliberate (and in the case of electric guitars often considerable) audible distortion or overdrive is usually the goal. The term can also be used to describe the sound created by specially-designed transistor amplifiers or digital modeling devices that try to closely emulate the characteristics of the tube sound.

The tube sound is often subjectively described as having a "warmth" and "richness", but the source of this is by no means agreed on. Possible explanations mention non-linear clipping, or the higher levels of second-order harmonic distortion in single-ended designs, resulting from the tube interacting with the inductance of the output transformer.

See also: Distortion (music) and Guitar effects

Harmonic content and distortion

[edit]

Triodes (and MOSFETs) produce a monotonically decaying harmonic distortion spectrum.[clarification needed] Even-order harmonics and odd-order harmonics are both natural number multiples of the input frequency.

A psychoacoustic analysis tells us that high-order harmonics are more offensive than low. For this reason, distortion measurements should weight audible high-order harmonics more than low. The importance of high-order harmonics suggests that distortion should be regarded in terms of the complete series or of the composite wave-form that this series represents. It has been shown that weighting the harmonics by the square of the order correlates well with subjective listening tests. Weighting the distortion wave-form proportionally to the square of the frequency gives a measure of the reciprocal of the radius of curvature of the wave-form, and is therefore related to the sharpness of any corners on it.[8] Based on said discovery, highly sophisticated methods of weighting of distortion harmonics have been developed.[9] Since they concentrate in the origins of the distortion, they are mostly useful for the engineers who develop and design audio amplifiers, but on the other hand they may be difficult to use for the reviewers who only measure the output.[10]

A huge issue is that measurements of objective nature (for example, those indicating magnitude of scientifically quantifiable variables such as current, voltage, power, THD, dB, and so on) fail to address subjective preferences. Especially in case of designing or reviewing instrument amplifiers this is a considerable issue because design goals of such differ widely from design goals of likes of HiFi amplifiers. HiFi design largely concentrates on improving performance of objectively measurable variables. Instrument amplifier design largely concentrates on subjective issues, such as "pleasantness" of certain type of tone. Fine examples are cases of distortion or frequency response: HiFi design tries to minimize distortion and focuses on eliminating "offensive" harmonics. It also aims for ideally flat response. Musical instrument amplifier design deliberately introduces distortion and great non-linearities in frequency response. Former "offensiveness" of certain types of harmonics becomes a highly subjective topic, along with preferences towards certain types of frequency responses (whether flat or un-flat).[citation needed]

Push–pull amplifiers use two nominally identical gain devices in tandem. One consequence of this is that all even-order harmonic products cancel, allowing only odd-order distortion.[11] This is because a push–pull amplifier has a symmetric (odd symmetry) transfer characteristic. Power amplifiers are of the push-pull type to avoid the inefficiency of Class A amplifiers.

A single-ended amplifier will generally produce even as well as odd harmonics.[12][13][14] A particularly famous research about "tube sound" compared a selection of single-ended tube microphone preamplifiers to a selection of push-pull transistorized microphone preamplifiers.[15] The difference in harmonic patterns of these two topologies has henceforth been often incorrectly attributed as difference of tube and solid-state devices (or even the amplifier class). Push–pull tube amplifiers can be run in class A (rarely), AB, or B. Also, a class-B amplifier may have crossover distortion that will be typically high order and thus sonically very undesirable indeed.[16]

The distortion content of class-A circuits (SE or PP) typically monotonically reduces as the signal level is reduced, asymptotic to zero during quiet passages of music.[17] For this reason class-A amplifiers are especially desired for classical and acoustic music since the distortion relative to signal decreases as the music gets quieter. Class-A amplifiers measure best at low power. Class-AB and B amplifiers measure best just below max rated power.[citation needed]

Loudspeakers present a reactive load to an amplifier (capacitance, inductance and resistance). This impedance may vary in value with signal frequency and amplitude. This variable loading affects the amplifier's performance both because the amplifier has nonzero output impedance (it cannot keep its output voltage perfectly constant when the speaker load varies) and because the phase of the speaker load can change the stability margin of the amplifier. The influence of the speaker impedance is different between tube amplifiers and transistor amplifiers. The reason is that tube amplifiers normally use output transformers, and cannot use much negative feedback due to phase problems in transformer circuits. Notable exceptions are various "OTL" (output-transformerless) tube amplifiers, pioneered by Julius Futterman in the 1950s, or somewhat rarer tube amplifiers that replace the impedance matching transformer with additional (often, though not necessarily, transistorized) circuitry in order to eliminate parasitics and musically unrelated magnetic distortions.[18] In addition to that, many solid-state amplifiers, designed specifically to amplify electric instruments such as guitars or bass guitars, employ current feedback circuitry. This circuitry increases the amplifier's output impedance, resulting in response similar to that of tube amplifiers.[citation needed]

The design of speaker crossover networks and other electro-mechanical properties may result in a speaker with a very uneven impedance curve, for a nominal 8 Ω speaker, being as low as 6 Ω at some places and as high as 30–50 Ω elsewhere in the curve. An amplifier with little or no negative feedback will always perform poorly when faced with a speaker where little attention was paid to the impedance curve.[citation needed]

Design comparison

[edit]

There has been considerable debate over the characteristics of tubes versus bipolar junction transistors. Triodes and MOSFETs have certain similarities in their transfer characteristics. Later forms of the tube, the tetrode and pentode, have quite different characteristics that are in some ways similar to the bipolar transistor. Yet MOSFET amplifier circuits typically do not reproduce tube sound any more than typical bipolar designs. The reason is circuit differences between a typical tube design and a typical MOSFET design.

Input impedance

[edit]

A characteristic feature of most tube amplifier designs is the high input impedance (typically 100 kΩ or more) in modern designs and as much as 1 MΩ in classic designs.[19] The input impedance of the amplifier is a load for the source device. Even for some modern music reproduction devices the recommended load impedance is over 50 kΩ.[20][21] This implies that the input of an average tube amplifier is a problem-free load for music signal sources. By contrast, some transistor amplifiers for home use have lower input impedances, as low as 15 kΩ.[22] Since it is possible to use high output impedance devices due to the high input impedance, other factors may need to be accounted for, such as cable capacitance and microphonics.

Output impedance

[edit]

Loudspeakers usually load audio amplifiers. In audio history, nearly all loudspeakers have been electrodynamic loudspeakers. There exists also a minority of electrostatic loudspeakers and some other more exotic loudspeakers. Electrodynamic loudspeakers transform electric current to force and force to acceleration of the diaphragm which causes sound pressure. Due to the principle of an electrodynamic speaker, most loudspeaker drivers ought to be driven by an electric current signal. The current signal drives the electrodynamic speaker more accurately, causing less distortion than a voltage signal.[23][24][25]

In an ideal current or transconductance amplifier the output impedance approaches infinity. Practically all commercial audio amplifiers are voltage amplifiers.[26][27] Their output impedances have been intentionally developed to approach zero. Due to the nature of vacuum tubes and audio transformers, the output impedance of an average tube amplifier is usually considerably higher than the modern audio amplifiers produced completely without vacuum tubes or audio transformers. Most tube amplifiers with their higher output impedance are less ideal voltage amplifiers than the solid state voltage amplifiers with their smaller output impedance.

Soft clipping

[edit]

Soft clipping is a very important aspect of tube sound especially for guitar amplifiers. A hi-fi amplifier should not normally ever be driven into clipping. The harmonics added to the signal are of lower energy with soft clipping than hard clipping. However, soft clipping is not exclusive to tubes. It can be simulated in transistor circuits (below the point that real hard clipping would occur). (See "Intentional distortion" section.)

Large amounts of global negative feedback are not available in tube circuits, due to phase shift in the output transformer, and lack of sufficient gain without large numbers of tubes. With lower feedback, distortion is higher and predominantly of low order. The onset of clipping is also gradual. Large amounts of feedback, allowed by transformerless circuits with many active devices, leads to numerically lower distortion but with more high harmonics, and harder transition to clipping. As input increases, the feedback uses the extra gain to ensure that the output follows it accurately until the amplifier has no more gain to give and the output saturates.

However, phase shift is largely an issue only with global feedback loops. Design architectures with local feedback can be used to compensate the lack of global negative feedback magnitude. Design "selectivism" is again a trend to observe: designers of sound producing devices may find the lack of feedback and resulting higher distortion beneficial, designers of sound reproducing devices with low distortion have often employed local feedback loops.

Soft clipping is also not a product of lack of feedback alone: Tubes have different characteristic curves. Factors such as bias affect the load line and clipping characteristics. Fixed and cathode-biased amplifiers behave and clip differently under overdrive. The type of phase inverter circuitry can also affect greatly on softness (or lack of it) of clipping: long-tailed pair circuit, for example, has softer transition to clipping than a cathodyne. The coupling of the phase inverter and power tubes is also important, since certain types of coupling arrangements (e.g. transformer coupling) can drive power tubes to class AB2, while some other types can't.

In the recording industry and especially with microphone amplifiers it has been shown that amplifiers are often overloaded by signal transients. Russell O. Hamm, an engineer working for Walter Sear at Sear Sound Studios, wrote in 1973 that there is a major difference between the harmonic distortion components of a signal with greater than 10% distortion that had been amplified with three methods: tubes, transistors, or operational amplifiers.[15][28]

Mastering engineer R. Steven Mintz wrote a rebuttal to Hamm's paper, saying that the circuit design was of paramount importance, more than tubes vs. solid state components.[29]

Hamm's paper was also countered by Dwight O. Monteith Jr and Richard R. Flowers in their article "Transistors Sound Better Than Tubes", which presented transistor mic preamplifier design that actually reacted to transient overloading similarly as the limited selection of tube preamplifiers tested by Hamm.[30] Monteith and Flowers said: "In conclusion, the high voltage transistor preamplifier presented here supports the viewpoint of Mintz: 'In the field analysis, the characteristics of a typical system using transistors depends on the design, as is the case in tube circuits. A particular 'sound' may be incurred or avoided at the designer's pleasure no matter what active devices he uses.'"[30]

In other words, soft clipping is not exclusive to vacuum tubes or even an inherent property of them. In practice the clipping characteristics are largely dictated by the entire circuitry and as so they can range from very soft to very hard, depending on circuitry. Same applies to both vacuum tube and solid-state -based circuitry. For example, solid-state circuitry such as operational transconductance amplifiers operated open loop, or MOSFET cascades of CMOS inverters, are frequently used in commercial applications to generate softer clipping than what is provided by generic triode gain stages. In fact, the generic triode gain stages can be observed to clip rather "hard" if their output is scrutinized with an oscilloscope.

Bandwidth

[edit]

Early tube amplifiers often had limited response bandwidth, in part due to the characteristics of the inexpensive passive components then available. In power amplifiers most limitations come from the output transformer; low frequencies are limited by primary inductance and high frequencies by leakage inductance and capacitance. Another limitation is in the combination of high output impedance, decoupling capacitor and grid resistor, which acts as a high-pass filter. If interconnections are made from long cables (for example guitar to amp input), a high source impedance with high cable capacitance will act as a low-pass filter.

Modern premium components make it easy to produce amplifiers that are essentially flat over the audio band, with less than 3 dB attenuation at 6 Hz and 70 kHz, well outside the audible range.

Negative feedback

[edit]

Typical (non-OTL) tube power amplifiers could not use as much negative feedback (NFB) as transistor amplifiers due to the large phase shifts caused by the output transformers and their lower stage gains. While the absence of NFB greatly increases harmonic distortion, it avoids instability, as well as slew rate and bandwidth limitations imposed by dominant-pole compensation in transistor amplifiers. However, the effects of using low feedback principally apply only to circuits where significant phase shifts are an issue (e.g. power amplifiers). In preamplifier stages, high amounts of negative feedback can easily be employed. Such designs are commonly found from many tube-based applications aiming to higher fidelity.

On the other hand, the dominant pole compensation in transistor amplifiers is precisely controlled: exactly as much of it can be applied as needed to strike a good compromise for the given application.

The effect of dominant pole compensation is that gain is reduced at higher frequencies. There is increasingly less NFB at high frequencies due to the reduced loop gain.

In audio amplifiers, the bandwidth limitations introduced by compensation are still far beyond the audio frequency range, and the slew rate limitations can be configured such that full amplitude 20 kHz signal can be reproduced without the signal encountering slew rate distortion, which is not even necessary for reproducing actual audio material.

Power supplies

[edit]

Early tube amplifiers had power supplies based on rectifier tubes. These supplies were unregulated, a practice which continues to this day in transistor amplifier designs. The typical anode supply was a rectifier, perhaps half-wave, a choke (inductor) and a filter capacitor. When the tube amplifier was operated at high volume, due to the high impedance of the rectifier tubes, the power supply voltage would dip as the amplifier drew more current (assuming class AB), reducing power output and causing signal modulation. The dipping effect is known as "sag." Sag may be desirable effect for some electric guitarists when compared with hard clipping. As the amplifier load or output increases this voltage drop will increase distortion of the output signal. Sometimes this sag effect is desirable for guitar amplification.

Blackheart 5W single-ended class-A guitar amplifier chassis with an additional GZ34 valve rectifier modification installed

Some instrument tube amplifier designs use a vacuum tube rectifier instead of silicon diodes, and some designs offer the choice of both rectifiers via a switch. Such an amplifier was introduced in 1989 by Mesa/Boogie, called "Dual Rectifier", and the rectifier switching is the subject of a patent.[31]

With added resistance in series with the high-voltage supply, silicon rectifiers can emulate the voltage sag of a tube rectifier. The resistance can be switched in when required.[32]

Electric guitar amplifiers often use a class-AB1 amplifier. In a class-A stage the average current drawn from the supply is constant with signal level, consequently it does not cause supply line sag until the clipping point is reached. Other audible effects due to using a tube rectifier with this amplifier class are unlikely.

Unlike their solid-state equivalents, tube rectifiers require time to warm up before they can supply B+/HT voltages. This delay can protect rectifier-supplied vacuum tubes from cathode damage due to application of B+/HT voltages before the tubes have reached their correct operating temperature by the tube's built-in heater.[33]

Class A

[edit]

The benefit of all class-A amplifiers is the absence of crossover distortion. This crossover distortion was found especially annoying after the first silicon-transistor class-B and class-AB transistor amplifiers arrived on the consumer market. Earlier germanium-based designs with the much lower turn-on voltage of this technology and the non-linear response curves of the devices had not shown large amounts of cross-over distortion. Although crossover distortion is very fatiguing to the ear and perceptible in listening tests, it is also almost invisible (until looked for) in the traditional Total harmonic distortion (THD) measurements of that epoch.[34] It should be pointed out that this reference is somewhat ironic given its publication date of 1952. As such, it most certainly refers to "ear fatigue" distortion commonly found in existing tube-type designs; the world's first prototype transistorized hi-fi amplifier did not appear until 1955.[35]

Push–pull amplifiers

[edit]

A class-A push–pull amplifier produces low distortion for any given level of applied feedback, and also cancels the flux in the transformer cores, so this topology is often seen by HIFI-audio enthusiasts and do-it-yourself builders as the ultimate engineering approach to the tube Hi-fi amplifier for use with normal speakers. Output power of as high as 15 watts can be achieved even with classic tubes such as the 2A3[36] or 18 watts from the type 45. Classic pentodes such as the EL34 and KT88 can output as much as 60 and 100 watts respectively. Special types such as the V1505 can be used in designs rated at up to 1100 watts. See "An Approach to Audio Frequency Amplifier Design", a collection of reference designs originally published by G.E.C.

Single-ended triode (SET) amplifiers

[edit]

SET amplifiers show poor measurements for distortion with a resistive load, have low output power, are inefficient, have poor damping factors and high measured harmonic distortion. But they perform somewhat better in dynamic and impulse response.

The triode, despite being the oldest signal amplification device, also can (depending on the device in question) have a more linear no-feedback transfer characteristic than more advanced devices such as beam tetrodes and pentodes.

All amplifiers, regardless of class, components, or topology, have some measure of distortion. This mainly harmonic distortion is a unique pattern of simple and monotonically decaying series of harmonics, dominated by modest levels of second harmonic. The result is like adding the same tone one octave higher in the case of second-order harmonics, and one octave plus one fifth higher for third-order harmonics. The added harmonic tone is lower in amplitude, at about 1–5% or less in a no feedback amp at full power and rapidly decreasing at lower output levels. Hypothetically, a single-ended power amplifier's second harmonic distortion might reduce similar harmonic distortion in a single driver loudspeaker, if their harmonic distortions were equal and amplifier was connected to the speaker so that the distortions would neutralize each other.[37][38][39]

SETs usually only produce about 2 watt (W) for a 2A3 tube amp to 8 W for a 300B up to the practical maximum of 40 W for an 805 tube amp. The resulting sound pressure level depends on the sensitivity of the loudspeaker and the size and acoustics of the room as well as amplifier power output. Their low power also makes them ideal for use as preamps. SET amps have a power consumption of a minimum of 8 times the stated stereo power. For example, a 10 W stereo SET uses a minimum of 80 W, and typically 100 W.

Single-ended pentode and tetrode amplifiers

[edit]

The special feature among tetrodes and pentodes is the possibility to obtain ultra-linear or distributed load operation with an appropriate output transformer. In practice, in addition to loading the plate terminal, distributed loading (of which ultra linear circuit is a specific form) distributes the load also to cathode and screen terminals of the tube. An Ultra-linear connection and distributed loading are both in essence negative feedback methods, which enable less harmonic distortion along with other characteristics associated with negative feedback. Ultra-linear topology has mostly been associated with amplifier circuits based on research by D. Hafler and H. Keroes of Dynaco fame. Distributed loading (in general and in various forms) has been employed by the likes of McIntosh and Audio Research.

Class AB

[edit]

The majority of modern commercial Hi-fi amplifier designs have until recently used class-AB topology (with more or less pure low-level class-A capability depending on the standing bias current used), in order to deliver greater power and efficiency, typically 12–25 watts and higher. Contemporary designs normally include at least some negative feedback. However, class-D topology (which is vastly more efficient than class B) is more and more frequently applied where traditional design would use class AB because of its advantages in both weight and efficiency.

Class-AB push–pull topology is nearly universally used in tube amps for electric guitar applications that produce power of more than about 10 watts.

Intentional distortion

[edit]

Tube sound from transistor amplifiers

[edit]

Some individual characteristics of the tube sound, such as the waveshaping on overdrive, are straightforward to produce in a transistor circuit or digital filter. For more complete simulations, engineers have been successful in developing transistor amplifiers that produce a sound quality very similar to the tube sound. Usually this involves using a circuit topology similar to that used in tube amplifiers.

More recently, a researcher has introduced the asymmetric cycle harmonic injection (ACHI) method to emulate tube sound with transistors.[40]

Using modern passive components, and modern sources, whether digital or analogue, and wide band loudspeakers, it is possible to have tube amplifiers with the characteristic wide bandwidth of modern transistor amplifiers, including using push–pull circuits, class AB, and feedback. Some enthusiasts, such as Nelson Pass, have built amplifiers using transistors and MOSFETs that operate in class A, including single ended, and these often have the "tube sound."[41]

Hybrid amplifiers

[edit]

Tubes are added to solid-state amplifiers to impart characteristics that many people find audibly pleasant, such as Musical Fidelity's use of Nuvistors (tiny triode tubes) to control large bipolar transistors in their NuVista 300 power amp. In America, Moscode and Studio Electric use this method, but use MOSFET transistors for power, rather than bipolar. Pathos, an Italian company, has developed an entire line of hybrid amplifiers.

To demonstrate one aspect of this effect, one may use a light bulb in the feedback loop of an infinite gain multiple feedback (IGMF) circuit. The slow response of the light bulb's resistance (which varies according to temperature) can thus be used to moderate the sound and attain a tube-like "soft limiting" of the output, though other aspects of the "tube sound" would not be duplicated in this exercise.

Directly heated triodes

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ van der Veen, M. (2005). Universal system and output transformer for valve amplifiers (PDF). 118th AES Convention, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. ^ Carr, Joseph J. (1996) [1996]. "6-7 Power Amplifiers". Linear IC Applications: A Designer's Handbook. Newnes. p. 201. ISBN 0-7506-3370-0. It was crossover distortion that was the root of the so-called ʻtransistor soundʼ imputed to early solid-state high fidelity equipment. Bias arrangements are used to overcome crossover distortion.
  3. ^ Self, Douglas (2013). "10. Output Stage Distortions". Audio Power Amplifier Design (6th ed.). Focal Press. p. 270. ISBN 978-0-240-52613-3. Unusually, there is something of a consensus that audible crossover distortion was responsible for the so-called ʻtransistor soundʼ of the 1960s.
  4. ^ Rockwell, Ken (2021-02-28). "Why Tubes Sound Better". KenRockwell.com. Retrieved 2022-01-05. Tube amplifiers sound better because of the euphonic distortions they add to the music, as well as plenty of other reasons I'll cover below.
  5. ^ Branch, John (2007). "Postmodern Consumption and the High-Fidelity Audio Microculture". Research in Consumer Behavior. 11: 79–99. doi:10.1016/S0885-2111(06)11004-2. ISBN 978-0-7623-1446-1. (also found in Branch, John D. (2007-05-23). "Postmodern Consumption and the High-Fidelity Audio Microculture". In Russell Belk; Russell Belk Jr.; John Sherry (eds.). Consumer Culture Theory, Volume 11 (Research in Consumer Behavior) (1 ed.). JAI Press. pp. 79–99. ISBN 978-0-7623-1446-1.)
  6. ^ Fliegler, Ritchie; Eiche, Jon F. (1993). Amps! The Other Half of Rock 'n' Roll. Hal Leonard Corporation. ISBN 9780793524112.
  7. ^ For example, Robert Walser Running with the Devil: power, gender, and madness in heavy metal music, Wesleyan University Press, 1993 ISBN 0-8195-6260-2 pages 43-44 discusses the "tube sound" sought by Eddie Van Halen
  8. ^ Shorter, D. E. L. (April 1950). "The Influence of High-Order Products in Non-Linear Distortion". Electronic Engineering. 22 (266). London, UK: 152–153. That high-order harmonics are more offensive than low has long been recognised...
  9. ^ Geddes, Earl R.; Lee, Lidia W. (October 2003). Auditory Perception of Nonlinear Distortion (PDF). AES 115th Convention. New York, New York: Audio Engineering Society.
  10. ^ Howard, Keith (September 2005). "Weighting up" (PDF). Multi Media Manufacturer. Peterborough, New Hampshire: Audio Amateur: 7–11. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-12-21.
  11. ^ A First Course in Electronics, pg 414-416. Anwar A. Khan and Kanchan K. Dey
  12. ^ Ask the Doctors: Tube vs. Solid-State Harmonics—Universal Audio Webzine
  13. ^ Volume cranked up in amp debate—Electronic Engineering Times
  14. ^ W. Bussey & R. Haigler (1981). Tubes versus transistors in electric guitar amplifiers. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. pp. Volume 6 p. 800–803.
  15. ^ a b Hamm, Russell O. (May 1973). "Tubes Versus Transistors –Is There an Audible Difference?". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 21 (4): 267–273. This paper, however, points out that amplifiers are often severely overloaded by signal transients (THD 30%). Under this condition there is a major difference in the harmonic distortion components of the amplified signal, with tubes, transistors, and operational amplifiers separating into distinct groups
  16. ^ Meusburger, Walter (October 1999). "4 Crossover Distortion in Class B" (PDF). A Novel Power Acmplifier Topology Without Crossover Distortion (D.Tech. thesis). Graz, Austria: Graz University of Technology. p. 27. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-11-20. Retrieved 2011-03-18. Crossover distortion generates unpleasant high order harmonics with the potential to increase in percentage as signal level falls and is much more objectionable to the listener than distortion resulting from a smoothly curved characteristic, even if they have the same THD. Therefore it is desirable to reduce crossover distortion to a minimum amount.
  17. ^ Pass, Nelson (2008). "Audio, Distortion and Feedback". PassDiy. Harmonic Distortion and Sound. Retrieved 12 October 2013. The smooth transfer curves of Class A amplifiers have a characteristic which is monotonic, that is to say the distortion goes down as the output declines.
  18. ^ Tubes vs Transformers: An esoteric exploration of tubes, transformers, tone and transcendence
  19. ^ R. S. Babbs; D. H. W. Busby; P. S. Dallosso; C. Hardcastle; J. C. Latham; W. A. Ferguson (1959). "Three-valve Stereophonic Amplifier". Mullard Tube Circuits for Audio Amplifiers (2nd ed.). Peterborough, New Hampshire: Audio Amateur Press. p. 123. ISBN 1-882580-03-6.
  20. ^ Sony Corporation 1999. Sony compact disc player CDP-XB930 Operating Instructions. (1). Specifications, p.20.
  21. ^ CDP-XB930/XB930E service manual (PDF). Japan: Sony Corporation. 1999. p. 1.
  22. ^ Rotel stereo integrated amplifier RA-935BX owners manual. MN10002975-A. p.4
  23. ^ Mills, Paul G. L.; Hawksford, M. O. J. (March 1989). "Distortion Reduction in Moving-Coil Loudspeaker Systems Using Current-Drive Technology". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 37 (3). University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK: 129–148.
  24. ^ Meriläinen, Esa (February 2010). "5.7 The Secret of Tube Amplifiers". Current-Driving of Loudspeakers. Createspace. pp. 111–112. ISBN 978-1-4505-4400-9. The most significant differences are, however, found in the output impedance. The output impedance of transistor amplifiers is typically less than 0.1 Ω, which denotes pure voltage feed for the speaker. In tube amplifiers, instead, the output impedance varies rather widely; from tenths of an ohm to even more than five ohms (with 8 Ω loading). A source impedance of even a couple of ohms is able to weaken the speaker's EMF currents so that the effects are observable; and as the value exceeds 5 Ω, the speaker may function at some frequencies even halfly current-driven.
  25. ^ "The Caged Frog -- A Pentode Based Transconductance Amplifier for Headphones". ecp.cc. 22 August 2010. Retrieved 14 October 2012. But, as I was about to disassemble it and put the parts away, I wondered what the circuit would sound like without any feedback. That is, just a pentode with a transformer load. I figured it was going to be awful, so I was not prepared for what I heard, which was near sonic bliss. From note one, this was something special. Turns out, I had built a transconductance amp more or less by accident.
  26. ^ Self, Douglas (2002) [1996]. "Damping factor". Audio Power Amplifier Design Handbook (3rd ed.). Newnes. p. 25. ISBN 0-7506-56360. Audio amplifiers, with a few very special exceptions, approximate to perfect voltage sources; i.e., they aspire to a zero output impedance across the audio band.
  27. ^ Smith, Peter Jay; Cordell, Bob (2005). "The Amplifier Guru speaks: Bob Cordell" (PDF). Jipihorn. Without giving the standard weakest link answer, how important is the amp as a component?. Retrieved 11 October 2013. The job of the amplifier is very simple. It must multiply the incoming signal voltage by a factor of about 20, and deliver a perfect replica of the signal to the speaker, independent of the impedance that the speaker presents to it.
  28. ^ Hamm, Russell O. "Tubes Versus Transistors –Is There an Audible Difference?". Milbert Amplifiers. Retrieved 19 July 2009.
  29. ^ Mintz, R. Steven (October 1973). "Comments on 'Tubes Versus Transistors – Is There an Audible Difference?'". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 21 (8): 651.
  30. ^ a b Monteith, Dwight O. "Transistors Can Sound Better Than Tubes" (PDF). J Audio Eng Soc. Audio Engineering Society.
  31. ^ U.S. Patent 5168438: Selectable dual rectifier power supply for musical amplifier
  32. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-11-08. Retrieved 2014-01-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  33. ^ Langford-Smith, F. Radiotron Designer's Handbook 4th Edition. 1952, p. 3
  34. ^ Langford-Smith, F. (1952). "14 Fidelity and distortion" (PDF). Radiotron Designer's Handbook (4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Wireless Press. p. 610. One interference which may reasonably be drawn is that any sharp kinks in the linearity curve, as usually occur in any class-AB1 or AB2 amplifier, have a far more serious subjective effect than is indicated by any of the standard methods of measuring distortion –whether total harmonic distortion, conventional weighted distortion factor or the standard form of intermodulation testing.
  35. ^ "First-Hand:The World's First Transistor Hi-Fi System - Engineering and Technology History Wiki". 12 January 2015.
  36. ^ Pete Millett's DIY Audio pages. Tube data. RCA 2A3 Power Triode.
  37. ^ de Lima, Eduardo (2005). "Why single-ended tube amplifiers? About distortion behavior between SE amplifiers and speakers". Audiopax. Archived from the original on 2007-08-15.
  38. ^ de Lima, Eduardo (2005). "Why single-ended tube amplifiers? About distortion behavior between SE amplifiers and speakers" (PDF). Retrieved 2016-03-15.
  39. ^ System distortion Archived 2008-03-18 at the Wayback Machine, Gerrit Boers
  40. ^ Li, Jerry (2019), "Using Transistors to Emulate Vacuum Tube Sound Quality Based on Asymmetric Cycle Harmonic Injection Method", 2019 IEEE 8th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Osaka, Japan, 2019, pp. 752-753.
  41. ^ Olsher, Dick (July 2001). "The Volksamp Aleph 30 SE Power Amplifier (product review)". Enjoy the Music.com. 5th paragraph. It effectively bridges the gap between solid-state and tube sound, blending tube and transistor virtues into a musically satisfying whole.

References

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tube_sound&oldid=1233479246"