Jump to content

Talk:Julia Solis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I saw this name as a page request. This is all I know and wanted to add some content. I tried. Oh well. CoolGuy 05:10, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Not a problem. It needs more than a single sentence, though. - Lucky 6.9 05:12, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I found some more info. I hope this qualifies as a stub. CoolGuy 06:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I wrote this page since I saw a page request on it. If it's considered equivalent to a vanity page, then that's fine with me. Just remember to take it off the request list. CoolGuy 04:19, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Looks like that art group of hers actually goes by Ars Subterranea. 139.76.128.71 16:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

I found 3 third-party references (Huffington Post, Fast Company, BOMB magazine) and added them to the article. I also removed some ridiculous WP:OVERLINKING. The article now looks like a stub which can be expanded upon. Reify-tech (talk) 20:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

[edit]

I think her article should be deleted. There is almost no information on her on the web, and I think wiki would be better served by an article on one of the arts groups she helped found, even if they are now defunct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.178.48.129 (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the article is only a stub, but a credible start, with references to 3 different regularly published magazines. References to her published books should be added. I notice that you have also worked on the Seph Lawless article which is considerably better developed (I have read the article, respect it, and have made a minor contribution to it as well). The fields of ruins photography and urban exploration are still developing, lack long-established authoritative references, and have only started to gain attention from mainstream media. I fail to see how deletion of information on one practitioner vs. another one advances the state of knowledge about the field in general. I think it would be better for editors to focus on developing more articles, rather than trying to delete the modest starts that exist so far. Wikipedia has plenty of room for more articles, and most of them have started from modest stubs such as this. Reify-tech (talk) 16:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bear in mind, though, that a stubby, ill-watched BLP is something of a nuisance for the subject. I think the idea of folding it into a larger article has some merit, but I'm not sure what the proper target would be. Choess (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Julia Solis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julia Solis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Julia_Solis&oldid=1203007562"