Jump to content

Talk:Main Page

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Template talk:MainPageIntro)
Archives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive.

001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207

Main Page error reports

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 22:27 on 9 November 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The date should be May. The main article also makes this error. Thank you for spotting it. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 FixedSchwede66 14:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

Errors in "Did you know ..."

From the article's lede: the official mascot of the Catholic Church's 2025 Jubilee. That wasn't actually verified in the body, but I just fixed that (existing source [1] verified). Even with that fixed, though, this does not make her the mascot of the Holy See, or even of the Catholic Church (which is not the same thing). [2], cited for her representing the Church at an event, calls her "the Vatican's official mascot for the 2025 Jubilee", which is ambiguous as to whether she's the mascot of the country or the event, but either way I don't think bleedingcool.com is an expert on mascots of the Vatican. So I'd suggest either ... that the Catholic Church's 2025 Jubilee has an official anime mascot or ... that the Holy See has been represented by an anime mascot. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 05:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the mascot is not "anime" in the usual sense of being a product of Japanese animation. At best it is an anime-inspired mascot, tokidoki is an Italian firm and as far as I know, there is zero input from any Japanese companies or artists. wound theology 12:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article says "has been compared to anime". Nothing saying it is anime, or anime inspired. Secretlondon (talk) 15:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to "has been represented by" and "anime-style". (We could go full U.S. veggie burger branding and call it "an'me", i guess.) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've suggested posting a correction at WT:DYK. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to copy from WT:DYK and add my two cents: Merriam Webster gives a more general definition of anime as "a style of animation originating in Japan that is characterized by stark colorful graphics depicting vibrant characters in action-filled plots often with fantastic or futuristic themes"; Britannica likewise gives "a style of animation that was created in Japan and that uses colorful images, strong characters, and stories that have a lot of action". Although several dictionaries do require Japanese origin as part of their definition, there is a shifting in the language to recognize foreign animation in the anime style as anime. (That being said, our article for non-Japanese anime like Totally Spies! is at Anime-influenced animation). Also, "having" a mascot is different than "being represented by" a mascot. The mascots listed at List of Olympic mascots only represented their specific games, but all are part of the broader category of Olympic mascots. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • ... that Kent Brushes have supplied their products (examples pictured) to every British monarch since George IV?

This entry is illustrated with a picture of shaving brushes. Of all the British monarchs since George IV, the two longest serving - Victoria and Elizabeth II, who collectively reigned for almost double the time of all the others combined - were women. I suggest that a picture of a shaving brush, typically used by men, may not be appropriate here. I propose File:Kent brushes 1872.png instead. Mitch Ames (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative image isn't very readable at thumbnail size, and the hook says "examples pictured", without guarantee that the examples used are representative of every British monarch. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 06:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hee-hee, yeah nah - Shhh, some women shave too:) - Who knows, the queens may have had their lady-in-waiting lather them up and do their legs! Forgive me. JennyOz (talk) 07:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The royal warrant of appointment system marks the supply of a product to a royal household, irrespective of who uses the product. The original picture is fine. Bazza 7 (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DukeOfDelTaco, Cambalachero, Kimikel, and RoySmith: borderline case, but possible a WP:DYKBLP problem for undue focus on a negative aspect of a living person? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's OK. They're a politician. Winning and losing elections is what politicians do. RoySmith (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in "On this day"

(November 15)
(November 11)

General discussion